Back

Sex-Specific Characterization of a Novel Osteoarthritis-Induced Heart Failure Model in Mice

Prasoon, P.; Tammen, K.; Meyyappan, A.; Dalvi, M.; Arnab, S.; Eschborn, M.; Fischer, R.; Kay, M. W.; Mendelowitz, D.; Bethea, J. R.

2025-10-16 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.10.16.682846 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chronic low-grade inflammation is increasingly recognized as a key driver of heart failure (HF) progression; however, the direct contribution of systemic inflammatory disorders such as osteoarthritis (OA) remains unclear. Here, we establish a murine model of OA-induced HF using destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) to induce systemic inflammation and sex-specific cardiac remodeling. Longitudinal echocardiography revealed that females develop diastolic dysfunction with preserved ejection fraction, resembling HFpEF, whereas males exhibit progressive systolic impairment, consistent with a transitional HFmrEF-to-HFrEF phenotype. Morphometric and histological analyses confirmed concentric hypertrophy in females and eccentric remodeling in males. Transcriptomic profiling identified distinct molecular programs--females upregulated extracellular matrix, cytoskeletal, and calcium-handling genes, while males showed enrichment of inflammatory and immune signaling pathways. Immunoblot analyses further validated these sex-specific molecular signatures: females displayed increased ANP, BNP, Sirt1, and AMPK expression, consistent with metabolic resilience and fibrotic remodeling, whereas males exhibited elevated p38 MAPK, NF-{kappa}B, LC3B, and cleaved caspase-3, reflecting heightened inflammation, autophagy, and apoptosis. Both sexes demonstrated downregulation of mitochondrial and lipid metabolic proteins, indicating convergent energetic stress. Collectively, these findings identify OA as a systemic inflammatory driver of heart failure, delineate the molecular and proteomic basis of sex-dependent cardiac remodeling, and introduce a translational preclinical model that recapitulates the clinical heterogeneity of HFpEF and HFmrEF/HFrEF, providing a foundation for mechanistic and therapeutic exploration.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.