Back

Opportunities and challenges for applying Key BiodiversityAreas Criterion E at large spatial scales

Mancini, G.; Cimatti, M.; Tzivanopoulos, M.; Thuiller, W.; Di Marco, M.

2025-10-16 zoology
10.1101/2025.10.16.682361 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are a cornerstone of global biodiversity conservation, influencing international strategic plans and helping protect thousands of species. KBAs are identified through quantitative criteria, among which the most recent is Criterion E. KBA Criterion E uses Spatial Conservation Prioritization techniques to identify highly irreplaceable sites, representing a promising tool for effective expansion of the KBA network. However, it has rarely been tested or applied at large scales. Here, we carried out a continental application of KBA Criterion E in Europe, using Species Distribution Models (SDMs) for 5,529 species of insects and 972 tetrapods. We stress-tested the application of Criterion E by changing the following settings: irreplaceability threshold, metrics of irreplaceability, representation targets, spatial resolution, and cost of planning units. Under the standard Criterion E settings, we identified 23 potential KBAs for insects, mostly along northern European coasts, and 88 for tetrapods, mostly concentrated in Mediterranean islands and southern Europe. These sites slightly overlapped with existing KBAs, showing that Criterion E can capture biodiversity patterns overlooked by other criteria. Our results also showed that the identification of highly irreplaceable areas is very sensitive to analytical choices. The strict irreplaceability threshold currently required, associated with the definition of representation targets, limited the selection of important sites almost exclusively to those containing very narrow-range species, and when such species were absent, important sites were preferentially selected on coasts, where the cost of planning units (represented by land extent) was minimized. Our analysis showed both opportunities and challenges of Criterion E and its applications with SDMs. We propose potential adjustments to the definition and guidelines of Criterion E, to improve its applicability at large spatial scales and on different taxa. Improvements of KBA Criterion E will ensure that KBAs continue to substantially contribute to the global conservation of biodiversity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.1%
2
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
5
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
10
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
12
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
14
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
19
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
28
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%