Back

Improving a removal model for evaluating density changes in a widespread invasive species

Foster, J. R.; Pepin, K.; Joseph, M.; Tabak, M.; Miller, R.

2025-10-16 ecology
10.1101/2025.10.16.680799 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Invasive species pose a significant threat to native ecosystems. Effective management of invasive species requires accurate abundance estimates through time, particularly at large spatial scales. Traditional methods of abundance estimation from management data, such as camera trap studies and harvest data, face challenges due to variations in sampling protocols and effort standardization. We propose an extension to a previously calibrated removal model by integrating into an Integrated Population Model (IPM) and incorporating multiple removal techniques. The model utilizes management and land cover data, both of which are readily available in many invasive species systems. We evaluate the model with a simulation study, then apply it to management data on wild pigs (Sus scrofa). Simulations showed that the model performs well across a wide range of densities and population trajectories. Density estimates were the most biased when effort and density were low and sharpshooting or fixed wing aircraft were used to conduct removals. We discuss the advantages and limitations of using removal models for invasive species management, how the model performs with respect to previous removal modeling efforts, how performance might be improved through changes to data management practices, and the models potential to inform decision-making processes for invasive species management. Data availabilityThe data for this manuscript is available from Dryad (http://datadryad.org/share/gFz3ClanB-8yPB5lQ1x-dl1JqI07CP3SX92P-9UyfaU). The code for this manuscript will is available from Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.15784366).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
2
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.4%
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
4
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
7
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.7%
10
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
12
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
19
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
20
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
21
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
23
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%