Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms: Nonclinical and Clinical Studies
Van Goor, F.; Francioli, L.; Sosnay, P. R.; Kreindler, J. L.; Ahluwalia, N.; Daly, M. J.; Chen, W.; Altshuler, D.
Show abstract
RationaleCystic fibrosis (CF) is a chronic, life-limiting genetic disease. Treatment with CFTR modulators (CFTRm), such as the triple combination therapies of elexacaftor (ELX)/tezacaftor (TEZ)/ivacaftor (IVA) and vanzacaftor (VNZ), TEZ, and deutivacaftor (D-IVA), have significantly improved clinical outcomes and quality of life for many people with CF. While most individuals treated with CFTRm report no change or improvement in neuropsychiatric symptoms, a minority have reported new or worsening symptoms. This has led to hypotheses that CFTRm or CFTR function could have relationships to neuropsychiatric symptoms. ObjectivesTest specific hypotheses about potential relationships between CFTRm, CFTR function, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. MethodsTo evaluate potential off-target or on-target effects of CFTRm and/or CFTR function on neuropsychiatric symptoms, we conducted four independent analyses: (a) in vitro off-target screening at clinically-relevant free concentrations; (b) nonclinical, in vivo behavioral pharmacology studies; (c) analysis of clinical trial and real-world evidence of CFTRm neuropsychiatric adverse events; and (d) human genetic analysis of CFTR functional variants in [~]1 million individuals diagnosed with neuropsychiatric disorders. Measurements and Main ResultsNo off-target effects of ELX, VNZ, TEZ, or IVA were observed in vitro at clinically-relevant free concentrations, nor were any behavioral findings observed in vivo animal studies. Clinical trial and real-world data covering >250,000 patient-years of experience with CFTRm did not show any increase in risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events. Human genetic analyses of functional CFTR variants did not identify association with any of 23 neuropsychiatric conditions. ConclusionsMultiple independent lines of investigation failed to show any evidence for off-target or on-target effects of CFTRm and/or CFTR function on neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene expression signatures of response to fluoxetine treatment: systematic review and meta-analyses 92%
- Genome-wide association study and multi-trait analysis of opioid use disorder identifies novel associations in 639,709 individuals of European and African ancestry 92%
- Leveraging genome-wide data to investigate differences between opioid use vs. opioid dependence in 41,176 individuals from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ultra-rare constrained missense variants in the epilepsies: Shared and specific enrichment patterns in neuronal gene-sets 90%
- A systematic analysis of the contribution of genetics to multimorbidity and comparisons with primary care data 90%
- Multi-ancestry omic Mendelian randomization revealing putative drug targets of COVID-19 severity 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.