Back

Migration patterns and hybridization within the Asian stonechat complex in response to a major geographical barrier

Zhao, T.; Anisimov, Y.; Heim, W.; Song, G.; Anisimova, V.; Batbayar, N.; Bossu, C. M.; Bours, A.; Chen, S.; Chen, W.; Davaasuren, B.; Dule, ; Jiao, S.; Jiao, X.; Hellstrom, M.; Langebrake, G.; Li, Z.; Liao, S.-Y.; Liu, A.; Liu, Z.; Roved, J.; Wang, X.; Weissensteiner, M. H.; Wen, G.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Ruegg, K.; Liedvogel, M.; Bensch, S.; Wertheim, B.; Lei, F.; Helm, B.

2025-10-16 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.10.15.682589 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Long-distance avian migration is thought to be under strong natural selection. Facing geographical barriers, migrants display various patterns considered to be adaptive. For example, they may detour along either side around the barrier or cross it, requiring specialized behavioral adaptations. Variations within closely related taxa are excellent sources for understanding the evolutionary background of migration and how barriers are shaping migration routes. In Asia, some species are assumed to have a migratory divide in response to the major geographical barrier, the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), including the stonechat taxa (Siberian Stonechat Saxicola maurus maurus and Amur Stonechat S. stejnegeri). As they detour along either side of the QTP, these taxa are believed to disfavor a crossing over the highland. However, the more southernly distributed Tibetan Stonechat (S. m. przewalskii) breeds on the QTP, suggesting adaptation to high elevation. To investigate migration patterns and the potentially associated genetic differences, we studied migration routes and population genetics of four populations around the assumed migratory divide in Russia and Mongolia, and of one from the QTP in China. Our results confirmed the existence of a migratory divide between maurus and stejnegeri, albeit with extensive hybridization. We observed both the hypothesized western and eastern routes, but also found individuals employing intermediate routes crossing the QTP, of which two-thirds were clear hybrids. Meanwhile, przewalskii followed a highland-crossing route and was genetically differentiated from maurus and stejnegeri. The diverse migration routes among Asian stonechats show differential responses towards the geographical barrier. The intermediate route may be associated with hybridization, and its conditional viability may facilitate gene flow between maurus and stejnegeri. The Asian stonechat complex thus offers great opportunities for novel research of the genetics and evolution of migration. The specific evolutionary background associated with inhabiting and crossing the QTP can offer new perspectives in this field. Teaser textMigratory divides can arise in birds because alternative routes around migratory barriers would select for behaviors to restrict hybridization. Hybrids of parental types that employ alternative routes are hypothesized to embark on intermediate routes that would expose them to suboptimal conditions, resulting in post-zygotic reproductive isolation. However, this hypothesis is challenged when a sister taxon actually breeds on the geographical barrier. This is the case in the Asian stonechat complex that breeds near or on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), the roof of the world. We demonstrated a migratory divide in central Siberia to Mongolia for race maurus and stejnegeri, yet showed also evidence for extensive hybridization. Hybrids migrated along a newly discovered intermediate route, seemingly viable and overlaps with the migration trajectory of race przewalskii over the eastern part of the QTP. The Asian migratory divide relative to the QTP thus provided new insights to the evolution of landbird migration.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.6%
3
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.0%
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
9
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
11
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
15
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Development, Growth & Differentiation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
18
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%