Back

Impact of modification of envelope proteins on the mechanical properties of HIV virus-like particles

Kruse, E.; van Diepen, M.; Chapman, R.; Horn, E.; Abdalrahman, T.; Williamson, A.-L.; Rybicki, E. P.; Roos, W. H.; Franz, T.

2025-10-15 biophysics
10.1101/2025.10.15.682533 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mechanical interactions between virus-like particles and host cells may offer targets for new viral treatments and vaccines with modes of action that are independent of the immune system. The physical properties of structures involved govern the particle-cell interactions. While the mechanical properties of virions and mammalian cells have been widely studied, data on virus-like particles are limited. This study aimed to determine the mechanical and morphological properties of HIV-1 virus-like particles with different envelopes. Three HIV-like particles, i.e. GagM + gp150, GagM + gp140HA2tr, and GagM + gp120HA2, were produced by combining the same Gag protein shell with different trimeric glycoprotein envelopes. The particles spring constant, breaking force, and dimensions were determined using atomic force microscopy, and the elastic modulus was quantified using finite element analysis. Spring constant, elastic modulus, and breaking force were higher for GagM + gp140HA2tr and GagM + gp120HA2 than for GagM + gp150. The particle height was smaller for GagM + gp120HA2 than for GagM + gp150 and GagM + gp140HA2tr. Possible mechanisms underlying the increase of the particles stiffness and mechanical strength are the inclusion of the influenza virus HA transmembrane domain in the HIV Env protein, and the lower expression and packing density of Env in GagM + gp140HA2tr and GagM + gp120HA2 compared to GagM + gp150 found previously. Upon confirmation, the proposed mechanisms offer potential to tailor the mechanics of HIV virus-like particles and guide mechanical interactions between VLPs and host cells towards improving vaccines.

Published in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials · published here
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
2
Virology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
European Biophysics Journal
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.2%
5
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.2%
7
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
8
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
11
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
13
The European Physical Journal E
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
15
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Cytoskeleton
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
19
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
22
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Journal of Virology
499 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
26
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Journal of Extracellular Biology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
28
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%