Back

Mathematical Modelling of the Mitochondrial Dicarboxylate Carrier (SlC25A10)

Nashebi, R.; Vera-Sigüenza, E.; Lyu, Y.; A. Tennant, D.; Spill, F.

2025-10-15 systems biology
10.1101/2025.10.15.680887 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1The mitochondrial dicarboxylate carrier SLC25A10 exchanges phosphate with dicarboxylates such as succinate and malate, playing a central role in metabolic regulation. Structural studies establish a ping-pong mechanism, but most mathematical models still assume sequential binding, lacking mechanistic justification and overlooking the alternation of a single binding site. Here, we present the first mechanistically derived and thermodynamically consistent model of SLC25A10 based on the ping-pong framework. The model incorporates competitive dicarboxylate binding, phosphate exchange, heteroexchange, reversibility, and electroneutrality, and is validated against experimental datasets. To estimate kinetic parameters and quantify their uncertainty, we employed Bayesian inference, enabling statistically rigorous calibration to competition assays. The model introduces new terms that quantify which substrate and from which side of the membrane is most likely to start the transport cycle. Beyond reproducing rapid exchange of different substrates that cannot be directly measured experimentally, the model captures the influence of mitochondrial morphology, enzymatic interactions, and metabolic perturbations on transporter behavior. Specifically, simulations reveal that matrix swelling increases, while matrix condensation decreases, the early SLC25A10 flux magnitude. Moreover, the model demonstrates how SLC25A10 contributes to succinate handling under SDH deficiency, functioning both as a gatekeeper and a pressure-release valve for matrix succinate. Under these conditions, succinate accumulates and is exported into the intermembrane space via SLC25A10, a process critically dependent on phosphate and malate availability.

Published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (predicted rank #20) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.