Experience-Based Co-Design of the Virtual Physiotherapist-led Evaluation of Referrals for spine surgery (VIPER) model of care: study protocol
Gamble, A. R.; Ferreira, G. E.; Maher, C. G.; Anderson, D. B.; Hutton, J. M.; de Campos, T. F.; Macpherson, S.; Han, C. S.; Sawan, M.; Harris, I.; Adie, S.; Hasset, L.; Legg, C.; Van Gelder, J.; Halliday, M.; Boogs, M.; Charteris, R.; Williams, C.; Billot, L.; Fullwood, D.; Riley-Gibson, E.; Molineux, E.; Tambree, K.; Tchan, M.; Sharma, S.; Zadro, J. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundDespite guidelines advising that most low back pain is best managed in primary care without surgery, many patients referred to spine surgeons have not tried effective non-surgical care. These patients can wait 1-2 years to see a surgeon and develop symptoms which become more complex and costly to manage. A promising solution is the Virtual Physiotherapist-led Evaluation of Referrals for spine surgery (VIPER) model of care which involves a physiotherapist triaging new patient referrals suitability for a course of non-surgical care. Participants will be discharged if they no longer need to see a surgeon or referred back to see the spine surgeon if they are not responding to physiotherapist-led treatment. Evaluation of similar models in Australia have shown 2 in 3 referrals for non-urgent musculoskeletal conditions could be appropriately managed by a physiotherapist without needing to see a surgeon. AimsThe aim of this study is to co-design the VIPER model of care so that it is user-centred and acceptable to patients, clinicians and key stakeholders. MethodsThe co-design and evaluation of the new model of care will be conducted across three phases. The first phase involved qualitative interviews to explore stakeholders perceptions of the proposed model of care. The second phase will involve co-design of the model of care with patients, clinicians and key stakeholders. This co-design study will use an Experience-Based Co-Design methodological approach to develop a final model of care for evaluation (third phase) in a randomised controlled trial in Australian public hospital spine surgery clinics.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 96%
- Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated health care delivery systems: a scoping review protocol 95%
- Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: The PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol (ISRCTN 46948079) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 94%
- The smallest worthwhile effect on pain and function for rotator cuff repair surgery: a benefit-harm trade-off study 92%
- Development and evaluation of rapid data-enabled access to routine clinical information to enhance early recruitment to the national clinical platform trial of COVID-19 community treatments 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing multimedia patient education materials for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of patient education videos 95%
- UK osteopathic practice in 2019: a retrospective analysis of practice data 95%
- Acceptability of a nurse-led non-pharmacological complex intervention for knee pain: Nurse and patient views and experiences 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mobile Phone Virtual Reality Game for Pediatric Home Burn Dressing Pain Management, a Randomized Clinical Trial 93%
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 92%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perspectives of Researchers and Clinicians on Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: An Interview Study 93%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 92%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.