Back

Automatic Sleep Staging from CPAP Airflow using a Dual Fusion Multi-Period Convolutional Neural Network

Chen, H.-Y.; Ahsan, M.; Zinchuk, A. V.; Husain, A.; Yaggi, H. K.; Wu, H.-T.; Chen, C.-Y.

2025-10-17 neurology
10.1101/2025.10.15.25337643 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy is the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, yet its use as a passive sleep dynamics monitoring remains limited. CPAP devices record only airflow signals, called CPAP-flow, which constantly interact with the pressure delivered by the device. This interaction renders the signal vulnerable to device-related artifacts and inter-/intra-patient variability, posing significant challenges to its repurposing for monitoring sleep dynamics. Methods: Motivated by neural network-based studies of sleep-wake transition from CPAP-flow, we leverage existing physiological knowledge and introduce a Dual Fusion Multi-Period Convolutional Neural Network (DFMP-CNN) model. This deep learning architecture leverages multiple period-specific convolutional kernels and a dual-fusion mechanism to jointly encode known short- and long-range temporal dependencies in CPAP-flow, overcoming limitations of traditional fixed-scale models. Results: Extensive experiments demonstrate that DFMP-CNN achieves state-of-the-art performance in CPAP-based sleep staging. On the Yale dataset, it achieves 78.5% accuracy (Cohens{kappa} = 0.605), with a best case of{kappa} = 0.886; on the Duke dataset, it reaches 73.6% accuracy ({kappa} = 0.524), with a best case of{kappa} = 0.805. Cross-dataset evaluations confirm the models transferability across clinical centers and device types, while feature and fusion ablation studies highlight its robustness. Conclusions: DFMP-CNN provides an unobtrusive approach for sleep monitoring using CPAP devices, providing a dual-purpose platform for therapy and longitudinal assessment. Significance: The robust performance of DFMP-CNN across datasets and device types underscores its potential to improve clinical assessment and optimize therapy management.

Published in Physiological Measurement · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.