Perceiving surface colour requires attention
Goddard, E.; Paul Remician, K.
Show abstract
Colour constancy refers to our ability to distinguish changes in surface properties from changes in the properties of light illuminating the scene. The apparent ease with which we can tell that objects do not change colour, for example, when moving from sunlight to the shade, belies the complexity of solving this ill-constrained problem. Although there is a substantial body of work testing which image cues might be used to accomplish this, there is surprisingly little known of how the brain performs this computation. Here, we tested a fundamental aspect of this perceptual process: whether it requires attention. We measured visual search times for both surface colour (requiring separation of surface and illuminant properties) and raw, colorimetric colour (which does not). We found a clear difference between the two: visual search for colorimetric colour was fast and near-parallel, while search for surface colour was slow and consistent with the serial deployment of attention. That is, search times suggest that the perceptual separation of surface and illuminant properties in colour constancy may require an attention-based process analogous to perceiving conjunctions of simple features in feature binding. Colour discrimination thresholds suggested that while colorimetric colour detection is fast and parallel, once attention was directed to these stimuli and perceptual scission occurs, colorimetric colour information was discarded by the visual system. These results offer important new insights into the sequence of processes the brain uses to accomplish colour constancy. Public Significance StatementThis work sheds new light on how the human visual system recognises the colour properties of different materials under varying lighting conditions. We find evidence that although material and lighting properties are perceptually separated automatically when attended, that this process requires attention.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Feature distribution learning by passive exposure 96%
- Meaning maps and saliency models based on deep convolutional neural networks are insensitive to image meaning when predicting human fixations 95%
- Divergent effects of absolute evidence magnitude on decision accuracy and confidence in perceptual judgements 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reappearing Sensory Input Guides Visual Working Memory Prioritization 95%
- Variance misperception under skewed empirical noise statistics explains overconfidence in the visual periphery 95%
- Imperfect integration: sensory congruency between multiple sources modulates selective decision-making processes 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.