Back

Adventitial leptin receptor-expressing fibroblasts are preferential contributors to fibrotic remodeling of the heart post infarction

Larcher, V.; Fischer, A.; Zhang, L.; Almolla, O.; Chiesa, M.; Andriani, F.; Wernet, C.; Serio, S.; Tombor, L. S.; Peruzzo, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Bussani, R.; Zacchigna, S.; Adams, R. H.; Dimmeler, S.; Evans, S. M.; Cattaneo, P.; Guimaraes-Camboa, N.

2025-10-16 cell biology
10.1101/2025.10.14.682477 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiac fibrosis, a hallmark of heart failure and an unmet clinical need, arises from pathological activation of pre-existing cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), but the contribution of CF heterogeneity to this process remains unclear. MethodsMurine models were used to lineage trace or deplete a specific sub-population of CFs at baseline and after myocardial infarction (MI). Transcriptional and epigenetic differences between fibroblast subsets were assessed using next-generation sequencing. Conservation in humans was evaluated through single-cell RNA-seq datasets and histological examination. ResultsIn mice, fibroblasts were the sole cardiac cell type expressing the signaling-capable isoform of the leptin receptor (LepR). LepR+ CFs emerged neonatally, occupied a defined niche in the coronary adventitia, exhibited enhanced hedgehog signaling, and responded to leptin. After MI, LepR-Cre+ CFs proliferated more than interstitial CFs, became a predominant fibroblast lineage in the scar, and their genetic ablation reduced fibrosis while improving function. LepR+ CFs were also detected in the human heart, where they were embedded in an adipocyte-rich niche. ConclusionsThese findings identify adventitial fibroblasts as key drivers of pathological remodeling and demonstrate that fibroblasts, rather than cardiomyocytes, are the principal responders to leptin in the heart, redefining how this major endocrine pathway influences cardiac remodeling and disease.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.