Back

Structural and dynamic studies uncover a distinct allosteric modulatory site at the mu-opioid receptor

Zhang, H.; Konovalov, K.; Parpounas, A. K.; Provasi, D.; Yang, S.; Abraham, A.; Warren, A. L.; Zilberg, G.; Wang, S.; Filizola, M.; Wacker, D.

2025-10-15 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.10.14.682454 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of the opioid receptor (MOR) offer a promising path toward safer opioid therapeutics, yet their mechanisms of action remain poorly understood. Here, we uncover the structural and mechanistic basis of BMS-986187, a chemically distinct MOR PAM with in vivo efficacy, using an integrated approach combining cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM), molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, signaling assays, and site-directed mutagenesis. We identify a previously uncharacterized allosteric site for BMS-986187, a lipid-facing pocket formed by MOR transmembrane helices 2, 3, and 4, distinct from sites occupied by other known MOR PAMs or negative allosteric modulators. BMS-986187 engages both receptor residues and a neighboring cholesterol molecule, suggesting a cooperative ligand-lipid mechanism. Our studies pinpoint residues essential for allosteric modulation, while information-theory analysis of MD trajectories uncovers specific allosteric communication pathways linking the PAM site to both the orthosteric agonist DAMGO and the G protein interface. Together, these findings redefine the landscape of MOR allosteric modulation by revealing a novel binding site, a potentially lipid-sensitive allosteric mechanism, and the molecular wiring of long-range communication within MOR. This work provides a new molecular framework for the rational design of PAMs targeting opioid receptors with improved precision and possible therapeutic potential.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.