The BirdsPlus Index, a novel method for assessing site-level conservation values.
Miller, E. T.; Larkin, J. L.; Matthews, A. M.; Parr, M.; Van Horn, G.; Giocomo, J. J.; Lebbin, D. J.
Show abstract
While there is growing interest in sustainable management practices to mitigate the biodiversity impacts of agriculture, logging, and other critical societal needs, implementation of such practices is often hindered by a lack of cost-effective, fine-scale metrics that directly link management actions to conservation outcomes. We introduce the BirdsPlus Index (BPI), a novel, scalable approach that integrates monitoring data, remote sensing, and conservation-weighted species scores to quantify deviations of observed site scores from spatiotemporally explicit expectations. Using nearly 29,000 recordings from the Macaulay Library, we generated acoustic checklists with the Merlin and BirdNET sound identification models under multiple detection thresholds. We matched these acoustic checklists with species-specific conservation values (BirdsPlus species scores), then trained random forest models to predict total, site-level biodiversity (the sum of these species scores) given environmental and effort covariates. The resulting model also enabled us to map expected BirdsPlus site scores across the landscape. These scores integrate information on species conservation status, ecological roles, and phylogenetic and functional uniqueness. BPI was calculated as the residual between observed and expected site scores, thereby providing a direct site-level measure of conservation value. Across 30 sites, we found that BPI values were consistent across acoustic models and detection thresholds, with high-scoring sites supporting regionally uncommon breeders and habitat specialists. While acoustic- and observer-based (eBird) models showed differing spatial patterns, both aligned with known ecological drivers such as urban density, elevation, and wetland cover. Our results demonstrate that acoustic checklists can be used to model expected biodiversity over time and space, and that the BPI provides a robust, interpretable metric for evaluating the ecological integrity of local sites. Beyond its immediate application to conservation planning, this framework lays the foundation for global, real-time biodiversity monitoring that leverages automated acoustic classifiers, citizen science, and remote sensing to integrate conservation value into development and management decisions.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- SAFE Acoustics: an open-source, real-time eco-acoustic monitoring network in the tropical rainforests of Borneo 93%
- Nighthawk: acoustic monitoring of nocturnal bird migration in the Americas 92%
- Disentangling effects of climate and land use on biodiversity and ecosystem services - a multi-scale experimental design 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian species distribution models integrate presence-only and presence-absence data to predict deer distribution and relative abundance. 91%
- Contrasted effects of human pressure on biodiversity in the UK: a multi-taxonomic assessment using airborne environmental DNA 91%
- Flexible Methods for Species Distribution Modeling with Small Samples 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.