Back

Somatic Hdac4-902fs mutations lead to loss of HDAC4 function through nonsense-mediated mRNA degradation

Paluvai, H.; Pepin, M. E.; Schreiter, F.; Saadatmand, A.; Hagenmueller, M.; Backs, J.

2025-10-15 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.10.14.682279 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are essential chromatin regulators and are involved in the regulation of gene expression by removing acetyl groups from histone and non-histone proteins. Histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) is known to regulate the process of endochondral ossification in mice by non-enzymatic repression of the activity of the RUNX2 transcription factor (TF) and to control cardiac metabolism in physiological stress situations. In this study, we examined the function of somatic HDAC4-902 frameshift (fs) mutations that are frequently observed in gastric and colon adenocarcinoma patients. Whether these mutations lead to a gain- or a loss-of-function is currently unknown. Here we generated a murine model bearing a germline HDAC4-methionine (M) amino acid (AA) 902-to-histidine (H) frameshift (M902Hfs) mutation. HDAC4-M902Hfs mice phenocopied HDAC4 null mice and present with premature ossification and early postnatal death. Mechanistically, we found that the HDAC4-M902Hfs mutation induced nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, resulting in loss of HDAC4 protein. This loss-of-function (LOF) effect was further supported by increased mRNA and protein expression of runt-related transcription factor-2 (RUNX2) and reduced class IIa HDAC enzymatic activity, indicating that HDAC4 contributes significantly to endogenous class IIa HDAC activity. Patient-derived data suggest that the HDAC4-902fs mutation is associated with reduced mRNA expression of HDAC4. In conclusion, our study identify that HDAC4-902fs mutation is a loss-of-function mutation, but raises the new question whether the loss of non-enzymatic mechanisms or the reduction in class IIa HDAC activity contributes to tumor progression.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.