Back

Urinary extracellular vesicles for high-precision bladder cancer subtyping and prognosis

Greenberg, Z.; Hutchinson, T. E.; Kahn, J.; Graim, K. S.; O'Malley, P.; He, M.

2025-10-17 oncology
10.1101/2025.10.14.25338041 medRxiv
Show abstract

Bladder cancer exhibits molecular heterogeneity that complicates early diagnosis and prognosis, and drives confounding clinical outcomes. Non-muscle invasive and muscle-invasive subtypes, especially for intermediate to high grade, carry a 25 - 50% progression-free survival rate, underscoring the need for high precision prognostic strategy. Urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) are promising carriers of tumor-derived RNAs and proteins. However, significant challenges in studying uEVs arise from the diverse cellular origin of uEVs associated with the dynamic composition of urine, which presents roadblocks for developing the clinical utility of uEVs. We introduced an AI-driven EV liquid biopsy pipeline that integrates (1) standardized EV isolation via NanoPom magnetic beads, (2) transcriptomic profiling for molecular subtyping, and (3) prognostic scoring algorithm. In a discovery cohort of 16 bladder cancer patients including both MIBC and NMIBC, we compared NanoPom isolated uEVs with ExoEasy and Fujifilm MagCapture isolated uEVs, for identifying bladder cancer subtype-specific gene signatures, and externally validated them using UCSC Xena. The result outperformed currently reported bladder cancer diagnostic biomarkers from assays including Galeas, CxBladder, and Xpert. In a validation cohort of matched 7 patient plasma samples, we confirmed with plasma derived EVs for correlating with urinary EV biomarkers from NGS sequencing. The prognostic score stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-grade risk groups based on Xenas bladder cancer survival outcomes. Our AI-driven uEV liquid biopsy pipeline proves the concept for high precision bladder cancer subtyping and prognosis, which could potentially facilitate treatment decision and lead to advanced profiling of bladder tumor biology using uEV liquid biopsy.

Published in Journal of Extracellular Biology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Journal of Extracellular Biology · published here
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.0%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.2%
3
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
5
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
8
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
10
Molecular Cancer
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.8%
12
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
14
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.0%
16
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
18
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.5%
24
ACS Sensors
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
28
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%