Health Information Seeking Experiences Among People with Disabilities: Results from the HINTS 2024
Velat, M.; James, T. G.
Show abstract
BackgroundPeople with disabilities (PWDs) face disparities in the healthcare system that lead to poorer health outcomes. A lack of health information and accessible communication with healthcare professionals is linked to these health inequities. PWDs report lower health literacy, technology use, and different access needs that limit effective health-related communication. Due to the broad spectrum of disabilities, the barriers PWDs face with accessing health information vary greatly. MethodsWe conducted an existing data analysis using the nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) conducted in 2024. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using logistic regression for five different cancer-related health information outcomes among US civilian, non-institutionalized adults who included disability status (weighted n=250,488,318). ResultsPrimary findings indicated that PWDs--especially those with multiple disabilities, chronic pain, or deafness--had disparities in their health information seeking experiences compared to people without disabilities. People with multiple disabilities had higher odds of reporting frustration and difficulty understanding health information, as well as not searching for health information in the first place. ConclusionPeople with disabilities experience barriers to seeking health information but these barriers differ on the type of disability. This study is novel in the ability to compare different types of disabilities to different health information outcomes, but true disability representation is likely not possible due to inaccessible survey design. The findings in this study highlight the need for accessible health information, surveys, and more interventions that include PWDs in public health programming.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 94%
- Factors Influencing Precision Medicine Knowledge and Attitudes 92%
- Health Disparities and COVID-19: A Retrospective Study Examining Individual and Community Factors Causing Disproportionate COVID-19 Outcomes in Cook County, Illinois, March 16-May 31, 2020 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological, social and financial impact of COVID-19 on culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a cross-sectional Australian study 92%
- COVID-19 risk perceptions of social interaction and essential activities and inequity in the United States: Results from a nationally representative survey 92%
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial and ethnic disparities for SARS-CoV-2 positivity in the United States: a generalizing pandemic 91%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 90%
- Association of Chronic Acid Suppression and Social Determinants of Health with COVID-19 Infection 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy January-March 2021 among 18-64 year old US adults by employment and occupation 91%
- Associations of Telemedicine vs. In-Person Ambulatory Care Visits on Cancellation Rates and 30-Day Follow-Up Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits 90%
- Characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccination status among staff and faculty of a large, diverse University in Los Angeles 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Forgoing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic in Geneva, Switzerland - a cross-sectional population-based study 90%
- The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and long COVID in US adults during the BA.5 surge, June-July 2022 90%
- Intentions to participate in cervical and colorectal cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.