Effectiveness of the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) for mental and behavioral health outcomes among women struggling to remain adherent to HIV treatment and who have experienced intimate partner violence in South Africa: A randomised controlled trial
Zheng, A.; Kane, J.; Mngadi-Ncube, S.; Fox, M. P.; Manganye, P.; Long, L.; Metz, K.; Sardana, S.; Alto, M.; Greener, R.; Thea, D. M.; Murray, L.; Pascoe, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundRates of intimate partner violence (IPV) and HIV in South Africa are among the highest globally. IPV is associated with a range of adverse mental health and HIV outcomes. The Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) is a transdiagnostic, evidence-based intervention delivered by lay providers. ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of CETA to active attention control in reducing IPV, depression, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and substance use among women at risk of poor HIV outcomes who have experienced IPV. MethodsWomen living with HIV with an unsuppressed viral load or at risk for poor adherence and experienced past 12-month IPV were recruited from Johannesburg-area clinics and randomised 1:1 to CETA or control (SMS HIV appointment reminders plus safety checks and planning). The primary trial outcome was HIV retention and viral suppression, reported elsewhere. This paper reports secondary outcomes, evaluated at three and 12 months: IPV, depression, PTSD, and substance use. FindingsParticipants were enrolled between November 11, 2021 to July 19, 2023 and randomised to CETA (N=202) or control (N=197). In the intent to treat analysis, the Cohens d treatment effect for depression at three months was 0.24 (difference in mean change -3.1; 95% CI: -6.1, 0.1) and 0.48 at 12 months (-6.2; 95% CI: -9.5, -2.8). The PTSD treatment effect was 0.39 at three (-0.3; 95% CI: -0.5, -0.1) and 0.47 at 12 months (-0.3; 95% CI: -0.5, -0.2). Effect sizes were larger in a subgroup of participants with the top 50% of baseline symptom scores (depression: d=0.50, d=0.74; PTSD: d=0.58, d=0.94, at three and 12 months, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in change for substance use or IPV. At baseline, only 12% of participants had past 3-month substance use and 32% had past 3-month or ongoing experiences of IPV, which made these outcomes challenging to evaluate. ConclusionsCETA was effective for reducing depression and PTSD including among high severity participants and at an extended follow-up. Future studies with increased power for substance use and IPV outcomes are warranted. Clinical implicationsCETA is a recommended treatment for depression and PTSD among this population. Trial registration numberClinicaltrials.gov NCT04242992, registered January 27, 2020 Key MessagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known about this topic?C_ST_ABSIntimate partner violence (IPV) and related mental health problems are common in South Africa and can lead to poor HIV outcomes, such as low retention in care and viral non-suppression. There is a lack of evidence-based mental healthcare options for women living with HIV who have experienced IPV. What this study addsAmong women living with HIV and past-year IPV experiences, we found that Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) was an effective treatment for depression and PTSD compared to a control condition. How this study might affect research, practice, or policyCETA is recommended to treat common mental health problems among women with HIV and experiences of IPV.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual Participant Data Network Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol 96%
- Friendship Bench Intervention to Address Depression and Improve HIV Care Engagement Among Adolescents Living with HIV in Malawi: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial 95%
- MOSAIC (MOthers’ AdvocateS In the Community) for Pregnant Women and Mothers of Children Under 5 with Experience of Intimate Partner Violence: A pilot randomized trial study protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increasing HIV Testing Among Sexual and Gender Expansive Men in Kazakhstan: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Trial of a Community-Level Intervention 95%
- Community-Based Accompaniment for Adolescents Transitioning to Adult HIV Care in Urban Peru: a Pilot Study 95%
- Maternal PrEP use in HIV-uninfected pregnant women in South Africa: Role of Stigma in PrEP initiation, retention and adherence 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- An evaluation of assumptions underlying respondent-driven sampling and the social contexts of sexual and gender minority youth participating in HIV clinical trials in the United States 95%
- Predictors and consequences of HIV status disclosure to adolescents living with HIV in Eastern Cape, South Africa 95%
- Missed opportunities for HIV testing among those who accessed sexually transmitted infection (STI) services, tested for STIs and diagnosed with STIs: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital delivery of Behavioural Activation therapy to overcome depression and facilitate social and economic transitions of adolescents in South Africa (the DoBAt study): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial 96%
- Symptoms of common mental disorders and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among adults living with HIV in rural Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study 95%
- Interventions in sexual and reproductive health services addressing violence against women in low- and middle- income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of pre-exposure prophylaxis on risky sexual behaviour of female sex workers in Dakar, Senegal: A randomised controlled trial 92%
- Effectiveness of integrated care for older adults with depression and hypertension in rural China: a cluster randomized controlled trial 92%
- Trends in HIV self-testing uptake in Africa: a modeling study of population-based surveys and HIV testing program data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.