Combined Exercise Training vs Health Education for Older Adults with Hypertension: The HAEL Randomized Clinical Trial
Santos, L. P.; Botton, C. E.; Wilhelm, E. N.; Helal, L.; Schaun, G. Z.; Ferreira, G. D.; Silva, L. X. N. d.; De Nardi, A. T.; Pfeifer, L. O.; Oliveira, N. L.; Silveira, A. D. d.; Polanczyk, C. A.; Tanaka, H.; Alves, L.; Galliano, L.; Pescatello, L. S.; Bock, P. M.; Moraes, R. S.; Alberton, C. L.; Schaan, B. D.; Pinto, S. S.; Umpierre, D.; The HAEL Study Group,
Show abstract
ImportanceHypertension is a prevalent condition among the elderly, necessitating effective lifestyle interventions to reduce ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and improve overall health. ObjectiveTo determine whether a pragmatic combined exercise training program is more effective than a health education program in reducing ambulatory BP in older adults with hypertension. DesignThe "Hypertension Approaches in the Elderly: a Lifestyle study" (HAEL) was a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial. SettingParticipants were recruited from September 2017 and June 2020 in two centers in Brazil. ParticipantsIndividuals aged 60 years or older with a diagnosis of hypertension as assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring or current use of anti-hypertensive drugs were included. InterventionsParticipants (n=160) were randomized to a supervised, moderate-intensity, training (3 times/week) that involved aerobic and resistance exercises in a pragmatic setting or to a health education program including weekly, 1-hour workshops addressing hypertension management. Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the 3-month change in systolic BP assessed by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Secondary outcomes were diastolic BP, endothelial function, functional capacity, and quality of life. Data analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat (ITT) and a prespecified per-protocol approach. ResultsOut of 717 individuals screened, 160 participants (mean [SD] age, 67.4 [5.5]; 104 females [62%]) were randomized. Compared with health education, exercise training did not reduce 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP (129.1 vs 128.9 mmHg; P=0.98) or diastolic BP (74.2 vs 74.4 mmHg; P=0.90), with measures remaining stable from baseline in both groups and no differences across daytime and nighttime timeframes. Compared with the health education program, combined exercise training increased peak oxygen consumption (0.4 ml/kg/min; 95% CI, -0.5 to +1.3) and Short Physical Performance Battery scores (0.7; 95% CI, +0.5 to +1.0). No major differences were detected between interventions for walking distance, quality of life, and endothelial function. The per-protocol analyses, restricted to non-dropout participants with [≥]70% adherence to interventions, yielded results consistent with those obtained using the ITT approach. Conclusions and RelevanceAmong participants in the HAEL study over 3 months, combined exercise training was not superior to a health education program to reduce ambulatory BP. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03264443. Key PointsQuestion: What is the comparative efficacy of a 12-week combined aerobic and resistance training versus health education in reducing ambulatory blood pressure among older adults with hypertension? Findings: In this two-center randomized clinical trial including 160 older adults with hypertension, there were no significant changes in systolic or diastolic ambulatory blood pressure after 3 months of combined exercise training or health education program. Meaning: A 12-week combined exercise training did not outperform health education in reducing ambulatory blood pressure in older adults with hypertension.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Telehealth versus Self-Directed Lifestyle Intervention to Promote Healthy Blood Pressure: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Heritability of cardiovascular health across three generations in South Africa: the Birth to Twenty-Plus cohort 94%
- ‘Self-Management Intervention through Lifestyle Education for Kidney health’ (the SMILE-K study): protocol for a single-blind longitudinal randomised control trial with nested pilot study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in rural South Africa: A cross-sectional analysis of the HAALSI cohort 94%
- Effects of Age and Sex on Systemic Inflammation and Cardiometabolic Function in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes 93%
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of a mobile health intervention optimised with artificial intelligence on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors in adults with high blood pressure: Rationale and design of My Intelligent Cardiac Assistant (MICArdiac) Randomised Controlled Trial 95%
- Effectiveness of An Impedance Cardiography Guided Treatment Strategy to Improve Blood Pressure Control in A Real-World Setting: Results from A Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial 95%
- Cardiac Post-acute Sequelae symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 in Community-Dwelling Adults: Cross-sectional Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of Singing on Vascular Health in Older Adults with Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial 96%
- Estimation of Life’s Essential 8 Score with Incomplete Data of Individual Metrics 93%
- Supervised exercise training in patients with cancer during anthracycline-based chemotherapy to mitigate cardiotoxicity – a randomized controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 95%
- Hypertension Management Dynamics in Pediatric CKD: Insights from the 4C Study 94%
- Elevated blood pressure in the emergency department - a risk factor for incident cardiovascular disease: An EHR-based cohort study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.