Back

SNRI-driven recovery of impaired pupil dynamics in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

Zeitzschel, M.; Maheu, M.; Donner, T. H.; Moll, C. K. E.; Buhmann, C.; Thomalla, G.; Magnus, T. U.; Höglinger, G. U.; Hagena, K.; Gulberti, A.; Pötter-Nerger, M.

2025-10-19 neurology
10.1101/2025.10.14.25337762 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundProgressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a tauopathy marked by early degeneration of brainstem nuclei such as the locus coeruleus (LC), a central player of the ascending reticular activating system (ARAS). ARAS dysfunction contributes to cognitive and arousal disturbances and is increasingly recognized as a therapeutic target. Methods14 PSP patients (eight females, age 70.81 {+/-} 6.32 years, disease duration 4.69 {+/-} 3.24 years) were assessed before and after [≥]4 weeks of SNRI (serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) treatment. Participants were assessed by non-invasive neurophysiological measures as pupillometry, performed at rest and during an auditory oddball paradigm, and clinically, using PSP-specific clinical scales and quantitative gait analysis. Pupil, cognitive, and gait parameters were compared with age-matched healthy controls. ResultsAt baseline, pupil size, pupil dilation responses and surprise pupil responses were reduced in PSP patients compared to controls, accompanied by impaired executive functions, reduced phonemic verbal fluency and depressive symptoms in PSP patients. SNRI treatment selectively rescued certain impaired pupil metrics in PSP, leading to a significant improvement of the surprise pupil response and partial normalization of pupil fluctuations at rest. Pupil metric changes were associated with notable improvement in executive functions and quality of life at follow-up. ConclusionIn summary, our findings reveal altered pupil-linked arousal regulation in PSP and its modulation by SNRI therapy, suggesting pupillometric indices as promising biomarkers of therapeutic response.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.