Back

Neural Phoneme Processing in Children with and without Dyslexia

Gillis, M.; Kries, J.; Wouters, J.; Gwilliams, L.; Vandermosten, M.

2025-10-14 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.13.682108 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study investigates the neural dynamics of phoneme processing in 7-year-old children with and without dyslexia (25;9 [male]), using EEG recordings collected during continuous speech listening. By applying temporal generalization to phonetic descriptor decoding, we can disentangle whether potential phoneme processing deficits are due to the maintenance of phonemes in verbal short-term memory and/or inferred differences in phonetic processing speed, both of which are thought to be impaired in dyslexia. We investigated whether phonetic processing depends on the phonemes position or its lexical competition. Our results reveal two key findings that may help explain the challenges faced by children with dyslexia. First, these children exhibit reduced decoding accuracy for word-onset phonemes, suggesting disruptions in either predictive, word-level anticipatory mechanisms or in the intrinsic rhythmic processing aligned with word boundaries. Second, they exhibit increased decoding accuracy for non-onset phonemes with low lexical competition approximately 400 ms after phoneme onset. This pattern suggests that children with dyslexia retain linguistically less relevant sounds longer in verbal short-term memory and process them more slowly compared to their typical reading peers. Together, these findings suggest that dyslexia is characterized by altered phonetic encoding strategies, specifically inefficient prioritization of relevant phonological information. This work provides new insight into the neural mechanisms underlying phonological deficits and contributes to a deeper understanding of the cognitive basis of dyslexia. Significance statementDyslexia is associated with difficulties in phonological processing. Investigating EEG during continuous speech listening, we show that children with dyslexia exhibit weaker encoding of word-onset phonemes and prolonged processing of less informative phonemes. These altered encoding strategies suggest inefficient prioritization of linguistic information, offering new insight into the neural basis of dyslexia.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurobiology of Language
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.1%
4
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
9
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
10
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.3%
11
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
17
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
23
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
26
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%