Extreme weather risk shrinks range size estimates and alters biodiversity predictions
Cohen, J.; Ellis-Soto, D.; La Sorte, F.; Sharma, S.; Jetz, W.
Show abstract
Extreme weather events, including heat waves, cold snaps, and droughts, are increasing in frequency and intensity with expected but little understood consequences for biodiversity. Extreme weather events can push organisms beyond their physiological thermal or hydric tolerances and thus limit where they can persist, affecting their geographic distributions. Species might be especially sensitive to extreme weather at the edges of their geographic ranges, where they are often already living near their physiological limits. However, the influence of climatic variability and extreme weather is often ignored in favor of climatic means when estimating distributional and richness patterns. Here we link hundreds of millions of citizen science bird observations from 2004-2024 to high-resolution extreme weather risk maps to explore how climatic variability and extreme weather risk alters summer and winter distributions and biodiversity patterns for 535 North American species. We find that species distribution models accounting for historical extreme weather risk performed better at predicting richness and the presence of individual species across 220 well-surveyed sites. Models incorporating extreme weather predicted narrower geographic distributions than models relying on only climatic means, with species ranges shrinking an average of 6% in summer and 10% in winter and range truncation observed at the range edges. These effects were observed in both seasons but were particularly strong in winter, a time with greater short-term weather variability than summer. Richness estimates were substantially lower when extreme weather was accounted for, especially in the US southwest and central plains (up to 30-40 fewer species), regions highly prone to extreme heat, cold and drought. Our results suggest that more mechanistically informed biodiversity predictions that account for extreme weather are critical for reliably predicting shifting distributional and biodiversity patterns.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Including imprecisely georeferenced specimens improves accuracy of species distribution models and estimates of niche breadth 96%
- The best of two worlds: using stacked generalization for integrating expert range maps in species distribution models 95%
- A cross-scale assessment of productivity-diversity relationships 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Global conservation prioritization approach provides credible results at a regional scale 95%
- Modelling the distribution of rare invertebrates by correcting class imbalance and spatial bias 94%
- Metrics for conservation success: using the 'Bird-Friendliness Index' to evaluate grassland and aridland bird community resilience across the Northern Great Plains ecosystem 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Elevational Range Sizes of Woody plants Increase with Climate Variability in the Tropical Andes 95%
- Beyond tracking climate: niche shifts during native range expansion and their implications for novel invasions 94%
- Determinants of genetic diversity and species richness of North American amphibians 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.