Back

Comparison of T1- and T2-weighted MRI contrasts of ex vivo ex situ brains fixed with solutions used in gross anatomy laboratories

Frigon, E.-M.; Perreault, V.; Gerin-Lajoie, A.; Sanches, L. G.; Moqadam, R.; Zeighami, Y.; Boire, D.; Dadar, M.; Maranzano, J.

2025-10-14 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.13.682071 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers high resolution and histological correlation, so protocols have been developed by brain banks using hemispheres fixed by immersion in Neutral-buffered formalin (NBF), but they provide limited tissue samples. Conversely, anatomy laboratories could supply complete brains perfused either with a salt-saturated (SSS) or an alcohol-formaldehyde (AFS) solution. These fixation methods alter the brains molecular properties, potentially affecting MRI quality and structural characteristics. T1- and T2-weighted (T1w, T2w) contrasts change with NBF fixation, but the effects of SSS or AFS remain unknown. We compared T1w and T2w intensities of different regions of interest (ROIs), including subcortical white matter (WM), cortical and deep gray matter (GM), in brains fixed with NBF, SSS and AFS. We scanned 20 ex situ hemispheres (NBF-immersed=7; SSS-perfused=7; AFS-perfused=6) in a 3T MRI scanner using T1w (0.7mm3) and T2w (0.64mm3) sequences overnight. Mean intensities of 29 ROIs in T1w and T2w MRIs and GM-WM ratios were calculated and compared in brains fixed with the three solutions. We found that T1w images were more affected by the fixation process, inverting the contrast of in vivo T1w and reducing the GM-WM contrast in AFS-fixed brains. T2w images resembled in vivo scans and maintained a sharp contrast in brains fixed with the three solutions, although the GM-WM intensity ratios were lowered in SSS-fixed brains. In conclusion, brains fixed with SSS and AFS from anatomy laboratories could be used for MRI studies, especially with the T2w sequence that seems more appropriate for structural analyses in different ROIs.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
8
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
19
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%