Back

Co-targeting menin and LSD1 dismantles oncogenic programs and restores differentiation in MLL-rearranged AML

Tayari, M. M.; Gomes Dos Santos, H.; Beckedorff, F.; Totiger, T. M.; Mookhtiar, A. K.; Kingham, A. L.; Lavezzo, G. M.; Mas Martin, G.; Huang, H.-T.; Karaca, E.; Bilbao Cortes, D.; Taylor, J.; Shiekhattar, R.; Watts, J. M.

2025-10-15 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.10.13.681683 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring MLL (MLL1, KMT2A) rearrangement (MLL-r) remains a lethal subtype with limited durable responses to single-agent menin inhibition. To define rational combination strategies, we performed a high-throughput screen of >900 epigenetic modulators in combination with menin inhibition in MLL-r AML models. This uncovered consistent synergy between menin and lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) inhibition, including with the clinical agent iadademstat. Mechanistically, LSD1 was found to interact with LEDGF/p75 (PSIP1), a chromatin-anchoring cofactor of the menin-MLL complex at H3K36me3 marked euchromatin. Chromatin profiling revealed extensive co-occupancy of LSD1 and menin-MLL components at leukemogenic loci in MLL-r AML cells. Dual inhibition of menin and LSD1 dismantled this chromatin complex, evicted H3K36me3 from LEDGF-bound sites, and reprogrammed transcription toward myeloid differentiation. Combined menin and LSD1 blockade repressed canonical MLL targets, including HOXA9, MYC, FLT3, PBX3, and CDK6, while restoring H3K36me3 and H3K4me3 and activating differentiation-associated genes. In vivo, the combination produced potent antileukemic effects in both MOLM-13 and MLL-r patient-derived xenografts, markedly reducing leukemic burden and extending survival without overt toxicity. These findings identify LSD1 as a critical cofactor of the menin-MLL-LEDGF axis and establish concurrent menin and LSD1 inhibition as a mechanistically informed combinatorial therapeutic approach in MLL-r AML.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.