Back

Genotype-phenotype modeling of light ecotypes in Prochlorococcusreveals genomic signatures of ecotypic divergence

Brenner, E. P.; Vang, C. K.; Johnson, C. G.; Ravi, J.

2025-10-14 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.10.13.678797 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Prochlorococcus is a cyanobacterial genus that exhibits photosynthetic capacity and remarkable genetic diversity. We analyze how Prochlorococcus genomics relate to high vs. low light environment adaptations, applying traditional comparative genomics and machine learning (ML) approaches to connect genotypes to phenotypes. We downloaded nearly 1,000 Prochlorococcus genomes from NCBI with information on their light adaptation ecotype (high-light/low-light) and depth of isolation using metadata through JGI. Average nucleotide identity analysis and traditional pangenome generation tools struggle to capture the cyanobacterial core genome, but despite its scant conservation, we clearly observe a sharp separation of the taxon by its light utilization preferences -- that is, its light ecotypes. A range of classical ML models trained to predict ecotype achieve exceptional binary classification accuracy even when predicting on partial genomes (Matthews Correlation Coefficient = 0.81 - 0.98), while regression models trained to predict the depth of isolation performed poorly, with relatively high root mean square error values (40.8 - 45.3m). For ecotype prediction, top features for the best-performing models included photosynthesis-associated genes and pathways, as well as some novel markers of unknown function. Our research findings recapitulate the extreme genetic versatility in Prochlorococcus and find that variable genetic markers allow excellent classification accuracy, and therefore, ecotype prediction, even for incomplete metagenomic assemblies, emphasizing the specialization and separation among these cyanobacterial ecotypes.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.