House value as an individual socioeconomic indicator for breast cancer survival and late-stage diagnosis: a population-based cohort study from Northern Ireland
Baxter, S. M.; McShane, C. M.; McIntosh, S. A.; Bennett, D.; Sharma, M.; Lohfeld, L.; Middleton, D. R. S.; Savage, G.; Fitzpatrick, D.; McBrien, A.; McCallion, D.; Gavin, A.; Cardwell, C. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundSocio-economic inequalities in breast cancer survival persist globally, including in the UK. Area-based deprivation measures may underestimate true socio-economic effects by assigning average levels to all individuals within an area. This study investigated associations between house value (individual-level socio-economic indicator) and area-based deprivation with breast cancer outcomes in Northern Ireland. MethodsWomen diagnosed with breast cancer 2011 to 2021 were identified using the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry. House value was determined from Valuation and Lands Agency property valuation data, and area-based deprivation was determined from the Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure. The primary outcome was breast cancer-specific mortality. Secondary outcomes included stage at diagnosis. Cox regression models calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and (95%CIs) for cancer-specific mortality by house value category and separately for deprivation, adjusting for confounders. ResultsAmong 12,766 women with breast cancer, associations were much more pronounced for house value than area-based deprivation. Women in the lowest house value category, compared to the highest value category, had a 60% increase in mortality (adjusted HR=1.60 95%CI 1.34, 1.92) and were more likely to be diagnosed with stage 4 disease (7.5% versus 4.1%; P<0.001). Women living in the most versus least deprived areas had a 26% increase in mortality (adjusted HR=1.26 95%CI 1.08, 1.47) and were more likely to be diagnosed with stage 4 disease (5.9% vs 5.0%; P =0.157). ConclusionHouse value demonstrated stronger associations with breast cancer outcomes than area-level deprivation, suggesting it may serve as a more sensitive indicator for monitoring health inequalities in cancer. What is already knownLower socioeconomic status is associated with worse breast cancer survival in the UK and internationally. Area-based measures of deprivation are widely used in epidemiological research but have recognised limitations. What this study addsWe observed socio-economic gradients for both late-stage at diagnosis and breast cancer survival for both house value and area-deprivation. However, associations were stronger for house value and effects persisted after adjustment for area deprivation. How this might affect research, policy and practiceOur findings establish that publicly available property valuations provide a feasible and sensitive measure for monitoring socioeconomic health inequalities at the population level
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of worldwide, national and sub-national severity distributions in Burden of Disease studies: a case study of individual cancer types in Scotland 93%
- Direct medical and non-medical costs of a one-year care pathway for early breast cancer: results of a French multicenter prospective study 92%
- Socioeconomic inequalities of 3-year survival in formal employees with colorectal cancer between 2012 and 2019 in Colombia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure 94%
- Reproductive Factors and Risk of Breast Cancer by Tumor Subtypes among Ghanaian Women: A Population-based Case-control Study 93%
- Prelude to Malignancy: A Gene Expression Signature in Normal Mammary Gland from Breast Cancer Patients Suggests Pre-tumorous Alterations and Is Associated with Adverse Outcomes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Area-based socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality in Germany – widening, narrowing or reversing inequalities between 2003 and 2019? 91%
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 91%
- Rho GTPase transcriptional activity and breast cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy 94%
- Investigating the relationship between breast cancer risk factors and an AI-generated mammographic texture feature in the Nurses' Health Study II 93%
- Characterization of Body Composition Dynamics Throughout Treatment in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.