Association Between Neck Pain and Osteoarthritis: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomisation Study
Shirinsky, I.; Shirinsky, V.; Alexandrovitch, E.; Plotnikov, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundNeck pain is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal complaints and has recently been recognized as a frequent comorbidity of osteoarthritis (OA). Whether this association reflects shared biological mechanisms or bidirectional influences remains unclear. ObjectivesTo investigate the bidirectional associations between genetic liability to neck pain and OA at three major joint sites (knee, hand, and hip) using Mendelian randomization (MR). MethodsA two-sample bidirectional MR study was conducted using summary-level data from large genome-wide association studies of neck pain (579,152 participants from the Million Veteran Program) and of knee, hand, and hip OA (up to 1.3 million participants from the international Osteoarthritis Consortium). The primary analysis was random-effects inverse-variance weighted (IVW). The additional analyses comprised of multiple pleiotropy-robust sensitivity methods (weighted median, mode-based estimators, MR-Egger, MR-PRESSO, MR-Lasso). ResultsGenetic liability to neck pain was positively associated with knee OA (IVW OR = 1.24, 95 % CI 1.10-1.41, p < 0.001) and showed a weaker, non-significant association with hand OA after correction for multiple testing (OR = 1.41, 95 % CI 1.03-1.95, p = 0.031). No association was observed with hip OA. In the reverse direction, genetic liability to knee (OR = 1.07, 95 % CI 1.03-1.11, p < 0.001) and hip OA (OR = 1.05, 95 % CI 1.02-1.07, p < 0.001) were associated with increased risk of neck pain, whereas hand OA showed no effect. Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results with no evidence of directional pleiotropy. ConclusionsGenetic predisposition to neck pain was associated with a higher risk of knee OA, while genetic predisposition to knee and hip OA was associated with higher risk of neck pain. These bidirectional associations suggest overlapping biological pathways that warrant confirmation in independent studies.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Allelic expression imbalance in articular cartilage and subchondral bone refined genome-wide association signals in osteoarthritis 94%
- The impact of education inequality on rheumatoid arthritis risk is mediated by smoking and body mass index: mendelian randomization study 91%
- Prodromal symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in a primary care database: variation by ethnicity and socioeconomic status 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Familial clustering of erosive hand osteoarthritis in a large statewide cohort 91%
- Sirt5 regulates chondrocyte metabolism and osteoarthritis development through protein lysine malonylation 91%
- Lowering of circulating sclerostin may increase risk of atherosclerosis and its risk factors: evidence from a genome-wide association meta-analysis followed by Mendelian randomization 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synovial macrophage activation mediates pain experiences in experimental knee osteoarthritis 93%
- Complement factor D (adipsin) mediates pressure-pain hypersensitivity post destabilization of medial meniscus injury 92%
- Development of primary osteoarthritis during aging in genetically diverse UM-HET3 mice 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.