Back

Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Tanzania: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kafaiya, C. B.; Mshiu, J. J.; Bishoge, O.; Mshana, J. M.; Malekia, S.; Mremi, I.; Lutambi, A.; Kilima, M.; Mayige, M.; Aboud, S.

2025-10-14 public and global health
10.1101/2025.10.13.25337859 medRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens global health. Understanding resistance patterns aids in treatment and promotes responsible antimicrobial use. This review and meta-analysis assessed the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinically relevant pathogens in Tanzania. A total of 18,265 studies identified from Google Scholar (18,000), PubMed (13), and Science Direct (252) underwent screening and full article review. Finally, 28 studies were included. A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the resistance patterns within antibiotic classes for specific pathogens. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of the studies and the prevalence of antibiotic resistance. Heterogeneity was assessed using forest plots and the I{superscript 2} statistic. Among the included studies, most isolates (25.0%) were obtained from urine samples. Of these studies, 75% were cross-sectional studies and 92.9% were conducted in hospital settings. The analysis revealed high resistance to penicillin, particularly amoxicillin-clavulanic and ampicillin, with Klebsiella pneumoniae (0.96 [0.83-0.99]), Acinetobacter baumannii (0.94 [0.67-0.99]) and Escherichia coli (0.90 [0.81-0.95]). Similarly, erythromycin resistance was most prevalent in Campylobacter spp. (0.85 [0.80-0.89]). Ciprofloxacin resistance was highest in Acinetobacter baumannii (0.54 [0.33-0.73]), whereas amikacin resistance was highest in Proteus spp. (0.86 [0.35-0.99]). Ceftriaxone resistance was particularly high in Acinetobacter baumannii (0.91 [0.70-0.98]) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (0.85 [0.74-0.92]). Resistance to meropenem was lowest among Escherichia coli (0.04 [0.01-0.10]) and Klebsiella spp. (0.07 [0.03-0.15]), with an overall pooled resistance to the ESKAPE-E pathogen of (0.11[0.06-0.19]). Imipenem and clindamycin each had an overall pooled resistance of (0.06[0.02-0.14]) against both Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The findings highlight widespread resistance among key bacterial pathogens, ESKAPE-E, particularly in the Access and Watch groups of antibiotics. The variability in resistance patterns underscores the need to re-evaluate empirical treatment protocols (STG/NEMLIT) to ensure effective treatment regimens, strengthen antimicrobial stewardship, enhance surveillance systems, and promote rational antibiotic use.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
46.4%
2
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.6%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.4%
PLOS ONE · published here
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
7
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
9
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
11
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
12
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
13
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
14
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
15
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
16
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
17
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
18
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
19
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%
21
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%