Systems and organisational change to advance gender equity in healthcare leadership: a mixed-methods protocol
Garth, B.; Ramani-Chander, A.; Proimos, J.; Rajit, D.; Loh, E.; Sigston, E.; Currie, G.; Riach, K.; Mousa, M.; Teede, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundDespite comprising over 70% of the global healthcare workforce, women remain significantly underrepresented in healthcare leadership. Structural and systemic barriers persist across academic medicine, health services, and professional organisations, limiting career progression and leadership opportunities for women. Existing efforts often focus on individual-level interventions, overlooking the broader organisational and systemic contexts that shape leadership pathways. Urgent, coordinated action is needed to address gender inequity through sustainable, evidence-informed systems change. MethodsThis protocol outlines the Organisation Change Management (OCM) workstream within the Australian Advancing Women in Healthcare Leadership (AWHL) initiative--a nationally implemented, multi-sector partnership. The initiative applies a mixed-methods, coproduction approach to implement and evaluate multi-level interventions aimed at advancing gender equity in healthcare leadership. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, the Learning Health System framework, and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance evaluation model, the study engages stakeholders across outer (policy, regulation, funding) and inner (organisational culture, leadership structures) settings to drive systemic and organisational changes to enhance gender equity in leadership. Data collection includes administrative datasets and policy documents, semi-structured interviews, and surveys across partner organisations. Findings will inform tailored interventions and an implementation toolkit, developed and evaluated through iterative stakeholder engagement. DiscussionThis is the first national initiative to apply a systems-level, coproduced approach to gender equity in healthcare leadership, engaging strategic partners including health services, professional colleges and associations, government, and women in the workforce. By leveraging implementation science and systems change methodologies, the initiative aims to accelerate sustainable organisational transformation. The protocol provides a replicable framework for advancing equity in healthcare leadership and beyond.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 95%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 95%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 94%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 94%
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Monash Learning Health System Maturity Matrix: Codesign of a Tool to Measure and Guide Improvement in Complex Health System Behaviour 93%
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 92%
- Healthcare workers experiences of working on the frontline and views about support during COVID-19 and comparable pandemics: A rapid review and meta-synthesis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 92%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 91%
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring variations in the implementation of a health system level policy intervention to improve maternal and child health outcomes in resource limited settings: A qualitative multiple case study from Uganda 93%
- Interdisciplinary perspectives on multimorbidity in Africa: developing an expanded conceptual model 93%
- Mentorship in Health Research Institutions in Africa: A Systematic Review of Approaches, Benefits, Successes, Gaps and Challenges 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.