Back

Methamphetamine Use and Psychiatric Morbidity in Sri Lanka: Sociodemographic Insights from a Tertiary Care Clinic

Galhenage, J.; Isuru, A.; Dayabandara, M.; Hanwella, R.

2025-10-14 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.10.12.25337849 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and ObjectivesMethamphetamine (METH) use is rising across South and Southeast Asia, yet evidence on user characteristics and psychiatric morbidity remains limited. This study examines the sociodemographic features, psychiatric symptoms, and their associations among METH users in Sri Lanka. MethodsA cross-sectional study recruited 245 consecutive patients attending a substance use disorder clinic at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). ResultsMost participants were male (97.6%), with a mean age of 31.3 years (SD = 9.7). Mean age of initiation was 29.2 years (SD = 10.0), with friends being the most common introducers (86.9%). Dependence was identified in 60.8%. Polysubstance use was frequent, with nicotine (93.1%) and heroin (73.9%) most common. Substance-induced psychosis (10.6%) and depressive disorder (4.9%) were the main psychiatric diagnoses. The mean BPRS score was 24.2 (SD = 8.0); suspiciousness (86%), hostility (82.5%), and depressive mood (61.6%) were the most prevalent symptoms. Higher BPRS scores were significantly associated with younger age, family history of mental illness, unemployment, recent METH use, and dependence. Logistic regression confirmed dependence as an independent predictor (OR = 6.8, 95% CI = 1.7-26.9) for higher BPRS values. ConclusionMETH users in Sri Lanka are predominantly young males with high rates of dependence, polysubstance use, and significant psychiatric morbidity. These findings highlight the urgent need for integrated mental health and substance use interventions and provide data relevant for regional and global public health strategies.

Published in Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.