Back

Evolution of crop phenotypic spaces through domestication

Wojcik, A.; Belcram, H.; Rousselet, A.; Bouet, M.; Brault, M.; Serin, P.; Desprez, A.; Rincent, R.; Peil, A.; Henry, K.; Marchal, C.; Lacombe, T.; Glemin, S.; Alix, K.; Gerard, P.; Manicacci, D.; Vigouroux, y.; Dogimont, C.; Tenaillon, M. I.

2025-10-11 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.10.11.681794 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIWe used domestication as an in vivo replicated experiment to investigate how divergent selection has shaped the evolution of multivariate phenotypic spaces. C_LIO_LIWe measured 11 to 57 qualitative and quantitative traits in 13 species, either unique or shared between species, and established a framework for cross-species comparisons. C_LIO_LIOur results revealed significant convergence that translated into a cross-species domestication syndrome. Most species exhibited a reduction of the multivariate phenotypic space during domestication. We brought evidence that Near Infrared spectra measured on leaves reflect phenotypic evolution unrelated with domestication, enabling its use as a control for sampling effects across species. Building on this, we developed a multivariate Phenotypic Divergence Index (mPDI) to rank species by the extent of phenotypic divergence under domestication. We found a high disjunction of wild and domestic phenotypic spaces in all species. Neither the mPDI nor the relative size of wild versus domestic multivariate phenotypic spaces was influenced by the domestication timing or mating system. Lastly, we observed a progressive decoupling of trait correlations with increasing time since domestication. C_LIO_LIIn addition to introducing a new index that can be applied for cross-species comparisons, our study uncovers recurring patterns shared among species, pointing to general principles underlying plant domestication. C_LI

Published in New Phytologist (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.