Characterizing Deep Brain Stimulation Dual Device Beat Frequency Artifacts
Diab, N.; Presbrey, K.; Cernera, S.; Rajesh, S.; Bechtold, R.; Giridharan, N.; Banks, G.; Storch, E. A.; Wang, D. D.; Starr, P. A.; Goodman, W. K.; Herron, J. A.; Sheth, S. A.; Provenza, N. R.
Show abstract
IntroductionRecording-enabled deep brain stimulation devices are used to treat individuals with a variety of neurological disorders, but current systems are only able to connect to a maximum of two brain leads. Off-label implantation of additional leads for unique clinical research questions requires bilateral implantable pulse generators (IPGs), however, slight mismatches in clock rates across IPGs produce mismatched stimulation frequencies. This mismatch creates high amplitude beat frequency artifacts (BFA) that occur at regular intervals and contaminate underlying neural signals, presenting unique challenges for future adaptive DBS (aDBS) algorithm development utilizing dual IPGs. MethodWe quantified BFA intervals in local field potential (LFP) recordings from 26 patients implanted with two IPGs during both continuous (cDBS; n=21) and adaptive (aDBS; n=5) stimulation modes. ResultsBFAs occur in all patients at varying intervals and require both devices to be turned on. We found that BFAs result from mismatched stimulation frequencies, where smaller frequency differences result in longer intervals between BFAs. The range in interval length between artifacts was 112 seconds to 30 minutes across patients. Switching to adaptive DBS (aDBS) decreased this interval to 30 seconds in a single patient. ConclusionIn a dual-device scenario, BFAs should be considered in LFP analysis or future aDBS algorithm design through implementation of mitigation strategies such as onset times and selection of minimally affected recording channels.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated artifact injection into sensing-capable brain modulation devices for neural-behavioral synchronization and the influence of device state 96%
- Controlling pallidal oscillations in real-time in Parkinson's disease using evoked interference deep brain stimulation (eiDBS): proof of concept in the human 96%
- Analyses of biomarkers for tremor using local field potentials recorded from deep brain stimulation electrodes in the thalamus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards adaptive deep brain stimulation: clinical and technical notes on a novel commercial device for chronic brain sensing 96%
- Automated optimization of deep brain stimulation parameters for modulating neuroimaging-based targets 95%
- Long-Term Performance of Utah Slanted Electrode Arrays and Intramuscular Electromyographic Leads Implanted Chronically in Human Arm Nerves and Muscles 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards individualized deep brain stimulation: A stereoelectroencephalography-based workflow for neurostimulation target identification 95%
- Stimulation-related increases in power spectral density covary with clinical evidence of overstimulation during deep brain stimulation for pediatric dystonia 93%
- Intraoperative laryngeal muscle and heart rate responses to implanted vagus nerve stimulation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Precision Mapping of Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Positions Associated with the Microlesion Effect in Tourette Syndrome 95%
- Reconnecting the Hand and Arm to the Brain: Efficacy of Neural Interfaces for Sensorimotor Restoration after Tetraplegia 93%
- Deep brain stimulation improves symptoms of spasmodic dysphonia through targeting of thalamic sensorimotor connectivity 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.