Back

Early Detection of Cognitive Decline in Parkinson's Disease Using Natural Language Processing of Speech: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Shankar, R.; Goh, Z.; Xu, Q.

2025-10-15 neurology
10.1101/2025.10.11.25337799 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCognitive decline affects up to 80% of Parkinsons disease (PD) patients, significantly impacting quality of life. Speech changes occur early in PD and may reflect underlying cognitive deterioration before formal diagnosis. Natural language processing (NLP) offers automated, objective methods to analyze speech patterns for cognitive markers, yet evidence remains fragmented across disciplines. ObjectiveTo systematically review and meta-analyze studies using NLP techniques to detect early cognitive decline in PD through speech analysis, evaluating diagnostic accuracy, methodological approaches, and speech-based biomarkers. MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, PsycINFO, and linguistics databases from inception to December 2025. Eligible studies must apply NLP to speech samples from PD patients for cognitive assessment. Two reviewers will independently screen studies using Covidence. Quality assessment will employ QUADAS-2 for diagnostic studies and PROBAST+AI for prediction models. Data SynthesisNarrative synthesis will describe NLP methodologies, speech features, and cognitive outcomes. Meta-analysis using bivariate random-effects models will pool diagnostic accuracy measures where appropriate. Subgroup analyses will examine performance by NLP approach, speech task type, and cognitive domain assessed. DiscussionThis protocol establishes methodology for the first comprehensive synthesis of NLP-based speech analysis for cognitive detection in PD, addressing critical gaps in existing reviews and providing a framework for evaluating this emerging diagnostic approach.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.