Back

GPU-accelerated, self-optimizing processing for 3D multiplexed iterative RNA-FISH experiments

Kruithoff, R.; Spendlove, M. D.; Sheppard, S. J.; Schweiger, M. C.; Pessoa, P.; Abbasi, M.; Presse, S.; Bartelle, B. B.; Shepherd, D. P.

2025-11-13 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.10.10.681751 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Imaging-based spatial transcriptomic approaches rely on iterative labeling and imaging of carefully prepared samples, followed by solving a computational inverse problem to determine the location and identity of the targeted RNA. Because these approaches require high-resolution optics, the Nyquist-Shannon determined voxel size is small relative to typical tissue sample footprints. A common solution to speed up both experiments and computation is to increase the distance in between focal planes, trading off local information content to sample a larger imaging area in a reasonable time. In this work we introduce a GPU-accelerated computational framework, merfish3d-analysis, designed to speed up the computational processing of barcoded, in situ imaging-based spatial transcriptomics. Using this framework, we quantify the information lost due to axial sampling changes in simulated imaging-based spatial transcriptomic experiments, robustly reprocess publicly available multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) datasets, and analyze new MERFISH experiments performed on a post-mortem human olfactory bulb sample. To improve the quality of experimental data in the post-mortem human sample, we designed a multi-step autofluorescence quenching protocol specific for in situ imaging-based spatial transcriptomic strategies. Taken together, we hope that the sample preparation protocols and single workstation, GPU-accelerated processing will further democratize imaging-based spatial transcriptomic experiments.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.