DeviceAgent: An autonomous multimodal AI agent for flexible bioelectronics
Lee, J.; Lin, Z.; Wang, W.; Baek, J.; Lee, A. J.; Aljovic, A.; Marin-Llobet, A.; Zhang, X.; Liu, R.; Li, N.; Liu, J.
Show abstract
The development of flexible bioelectronics remains a complex, multidisciplinary process that demands specialized expertise and labor-intensive efforts, limiting scalability, adaptability and accessibility. Here, we introduce DeviceAgent, an autonomous multimodal AI agent that integrates large language models (LLMs), vision-language models (VLMs), and domain-specific computational tools into a unified framework for bioelectronics research. Leveraging the emergent reasoning abilities of LLMs and VLMs, DeviceAgent enables zero and few-shot generalization, contextual learning, and flexible task execution across modalities. A multimodal context memory system orchestrates these capabilities, providing end-to-end support across the experimental pipeline-from high-level design objectives to fabrication protocol generation, visual defect inspection, and electrophysiological signal analysis, while maintaining human oversight at critical decision points. We demonstrate its capabilities through the development of stretchable mesh electronics for interfacing with human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs), a representative application involving complex device architectures, heterogeneous material nanofabrication, and electrophysiology analysis. DeviceAgent autonomously (1) generates customized bioelectronic layouts; (2) creates comprehensive fabrication protocols tailored to specific materials and processes; (3) identifies microscopic defects using visual reasoning; and (4) analyzes cardiac electrophysiological recordings in an interpretable manner. By embedding LLMs and VLMs within a structured, tool-augmented architecture, DeviceAgent establishes a scalable and accessible paradigm for AI-scientist collaboration in nanofabrication and bioelectronics research.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Graphene microelectrode arrays, 4D structured illumination microscopy, and a machine learning-based spike sorting algorithm permit the analysis of ultrastructural neuronal changes during neuronal signalling in a model of Niemann-Pick disease type C 94%
- Synergizing algorithmic design, photoclick chemistry and multi-material volumetric printing for accelerating complex shape engineering 93%
- Multimodal layer-crossing interrogation of brain circuits enabled by microfluidic axialtrodes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- In vivo fluorescence imaging with a flat, lensless microscope 92%
- STRAIGHT-IN Dual: a platform for dual, single-copyintegrations of DNA payloads and gene circuits into human induced pluripotent stem cells 91%
- Scalable projected Light Sheet Microscopy for high-resolution imaging of living and cleared samples 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Flexible 3D kirigami probes for in vitro and in vivo neural applications 96%
- A method for three-dimensional single-cell chronic electrophysiology from developing brain organoids 95%
- A low-cost, open-source 3D printer for multimaterial and high-throughput direct ink writing of soft and living materials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Colocalized, Bidirectional Optogenetic Modulations in Freely Behaving Animals with a Wireless Dual-Color Optoelectronic Probe 93%
- 3D printed biomimetic cochleae and machine learning co-modelling provides clinical informatics for cochlear implant patients 93%
- Digital data storage on DNA tape using CRISPR base editors 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A microphysiological system for parallelized morphological and electrophysiological read-out of 3D neuronal cell culture 93%
- Rapid Identification of Bacterial isolates Using Microfluidic Adaptive Channels and Multiplexed Fluorescence Microscopy 93%
- Injection molded open microfluidic well plate inserts for user-friendly coculture and microscopy 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.