Shared and distinct neural signatures of inhibitory control deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism
Roussat, M.; Gao, Z.; Cai, W.; Vaidya, C.; Supekar, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) share deficits in inhibitory control, yet direct comparisons of their neurobiological underpinnings remain sparse and are often confounded by comorbidity. We examined shared and distinct abnormalities in brain activation and circuit connectivity associated with inhibitory control in non-comorbid ADHD and ASD. MethodsBrain activity and hyperdirect pathway connectivity during inhibitory control were examined in children with non-comorbid ADHD (age: 11.1{+/-}0.24y) and children with non-comorbid ASD (age: 11.1{+/-}0.39y), compared with typically developing (TD) children (age: 10.9{+/-}0.09y), and benchmarked against healthy adults (age: 24.1{+/-}1.26y), using fMRI stop-signal task data. ResultsBoth ADHD and ASD groups showed reduced activation in salience and frontoparietal network regions alongside increased activation in default mode network (DMN) regions, consistent with triple-network dysfunction. These activation deficits were more pronounced in ASD, whose activation profile also diverged most from adults. At the circuit level, only ASD showed abnormal hyperdirect connectivity, involving insula-STN and preSMA-STN pathways and further reflected in a composite insula/IFG-STN connectivity measure, indicating broader cortical-STN disruption. Importantly, across all children, reduced salience/frontoparietal relative to DMN engagement correlated with greater parent-reported inhibitory control deficits, and in ASD, individual differences in insula/IFG-STN connectivity showed the same association, highlighting the behavioral relevance of both network- and circuit-level abnormalities. ConclusionsADHD and ASD share network-level but differ in circuit-level abnormalities underlying inhibitory control deficits. Together, these insights advance the neurobiology of inhibitory control in ADHD and ASD and provide potential targets for neuroscience-informed interventions addressing both shared and disorder-specific mechanisms.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Autism is associated with inter-individual variations of gray and white matter morphology 95%
- Limbic System White Matter in Children and Adolescents with ADHD: A Longitudinal Diffusion MRI Analysis 95%
- Transdiagnostic Neurobiology of Social Cognition and Individual Variability as Measured by Fractional Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuation in Schizophrenia and Autism Spectrum Disorders 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal alterations in fronto-striatal glutamate are associated with functioning during inhibitory control in autism spectrum disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder 95%
- Examining the relationship between social cognition and neural synchrony during movies in children with and without autism 95%
- Clarifying the role of Cortico-Cortical and Amygdalo-Cortical brain dysconnectivity associated with Conduct Problems 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond massive univariate tests: Covariance regression reveals complex patterns of functional connectivity related to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, age, sex, and response control 97%
- Dynamic Resting-State Network Markers of Disruptive Behavior Problems in Youth 95%
- Functional connectivity in the social perception pathway at birth is linked with attention to faces at 4 months 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissecting the heterogeneous subcortical brain volume of Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using community detection 95%
- Decreased homotopic interhemispheric functional connectivity in children with autism spectrum disorder 95%
- Altered global modular organization of intrinsic functional connectivity in autism arises from atypical node-level processing 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.