ACETYLATED α-TUBULIN LYSINE 394 IS CRITICAL FOR AXON OUTGROWTH IN THE ADULT MUSHROOM BODIES OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Welch, C. J.; Mueller, L. O.; Trujillo, S. P.; Wildonger, J.
Show abstract
Disruptions in the microtubule cytoskeleton play a role in various neurological diseases that afflict a large fraction of the population. Microtubule function is regulated by post-translational modifications like acetylation, and one consistently identified acetylation site in mammals and Drosophila melanogaster is -tubulin lysine 394 (K394). Our previous research demonstrated that an acetylation-blocking point mutation--K394R--causes a decrease in microtubule stability in axon terminals at the developing neuromuscular junction. Here, we asked whether K394 acetylation regulates the development of additional neuronal structures. Using the central brain mushroom body as a model, we found that K394R results in {beta} lobe overextension at the midline. The K394R phenotype manifests during metamorphosis and affects {beta} lobe growth in a cell-autonomous manner. Our data suggest that the K394R phenotype may result from changes in Tau, a microtubule-associated protein enriched in the mushroom body and known to play a critical role in regulating neuronal microtubules. Knocking-out tau resulted in defects in midline crossing similar to K394R. However, when the loss of tau was combined with K394R, {beta} lobe extension was normal--indicating that the loss of tau suppresses the K394R phenotype and vice versa. While overexpressing tau also resulted in a midline crossing phenotype, K394R in combination with elevated Tau resulted in a severely malformed mushroom body. Altogether, our work suggests that K394R interacts with tau to regulate axon outgrowth during mushroom body development and raises the potential of manipulating K394 acetylation to ameliorate neurological disease resulting from axonal growth defects and changes in Tau.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Conserved and divergent aspects of Robo receptor signaling and regulation between Drosophila Robo1 and C. elegans SAX-3 97%
- Neuronal post-developmentally acting SAX-7S/L1CAM can function as cleaved fragments to maintain neuronal architecture in C. elegans 96%
- Imaginal disc growth factors are Drosophila Chitinase-like Proteins with roles in morphogenesis and CO2 response 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of Drosophila attP40 background on the glomerular organization of Or47b olfactory receptor neurons 96%
- Loss of pseudouridine synthases in the RluA family causes hypersensitive nociception in Drosophila 96%
- Detecting new allies: Modifier screen identifies a genetic interaction between Imaginal disc growth factor 3 and a Rho-kinase substrate during dorsal appendage tube formation in Drosophila 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sticks and Stones, a conserved cell surface ligand for the Type IIa RPTP Lar, regulates neural circuit wiring in Drosophila 97%
- Rab11 suppresses neuronal stress signaling by localizing Dual leucine zipper kinase to axon terminals for protein turnover. 97%
- Unc-4 acts to promote neuronal identity and development of the take-off circuit in the Drosophila CNS 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nucleolar stress in Drosophila neuroblasts, a model for human ribosomopathies 97%
- The Drosophila orthologue of the primary ciliary dyskinesia-associated gene, DNAAF3, is required for axonemal dynein assembly 97%
- Neuronal upregulation of Prospero protein is driven by alternative mRNA polyadenylation and Syncrip-mediated mRNA stabilisation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary conservation of midline axon guidance activity between Drosophila and Tribolium Frazzled 97%
- The collagen-binding epitopes of Drosophila SPARC are essential for survival and collagen IV distribution and assembly into basement membranes 96%
- IPPK-1 and IP6 contribute to ventral nerve cord assembly in C. elegans 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.