Back

Challenging the loss of complexity theory: insights from the neuromuscular system in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chatain, C.; Ramdani, S.; Paleiron, N.; Cucchietti Waltz, F.; Jobic, A.; Vallier, J.-M.; Gruet, M.

2025-10-11 physiology
10.1101/2025.10.10.681623 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAccording to the "loss of complexity" theory, aging and disease are expected to reduce complexity of physiological outputs, thereby limiting the systems adaptability. However, it remains unclear whether this concept applies to the neuromuscular system in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (pwCOPD). This study aimed to challenge the loss of complexity hypothesis by assessing the regularity, as well as the steadiness and the accuracy, of force production during submaximal isometric contractions in pwCOPD compared to healthy individuals. MethodsSeventeen pwCOPD and seventeen age- and sex-matched healthy participants performed submaximal isometric contractions of the knee extensors at six target forces, ranging from 10 to 60% of their maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Regularity of force signals was assessed using sample entropy (SampEn) and percentage of determinism (DET) from the recurrence quantification analysis. Steadiness and accuracy were quantified using the coefficient of variation (CV) and the root-mean-square error (RMSE), respectively. ResultsPwCOPD exhibited 26.5% lower MVC than healthy individuals. Despite this muscular weakness, no significant main effect of group or interaction effect (group x contraction intensity) was observed for SampEn, DET, CV and RMSE, suggesting a preserved force control in pwCOPD at all assessed force levels. ConclusionOur results indicate that the loss of complexity theory may not apply in moderate COPD, at least for the neuromuscular system. These findings suggest that neuromuscular alteration associated with COPD may not be sufficient to impair the complexity of force output, questioning the universality of the loss of complexity theory.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.7%
2
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.6%
4
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
8
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
10
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%