Population density triggers wing dimorphism via NlNompC-mediated insulin signaling in Nilaparvata lugens
Zhu, Z.; Hua, H.; Tian, M.; Li, Y.; Qiao, Z.; Zhu, X.; Wen, D.; Wang, S.; Ma, W.
Show abstract
The Nilaparvata lugens employs wing dimorphism as a key adaptive strategy to environmental heterogeneity. While hormonal pathways and transcription factors governing nutrient-induced wing plasticity are known, how population density triggers developmental divergence remains unresolved. Here, we mechanistically dissect density-dependent wing morph determination, revealing tactile inter-individual contact as the primary signal. High-density conditions amplify gentle-touch frequency, which is detected by mechanosensitive ion channels NlNompC and NlNMDARs. Genetic silencing or pharmacological inhibition of these channels abolished density-induced long-winged morphogenesis. The conserved role of NlNompC in gentle-touch sensation was validated by rescuing tactile perception deficits in Drosophila nompC mutants. Crucially, NlNompC integrates tactile cues into insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling (IIS): crowding-driven mechanical stimuli upregulate NlIlp3, while suppressing NlInR2, to activate wing elongation programs. Epistasis experiments confirmed IIS as the key downstream pathway, with co-silencing NlInR2 or NlFoxO rescuing the short-winged phenotype induced by NlNompC knockdown or low population density, silencing NlIlp3 or NlInR1 rescuing the long-winged phenotype induced by high population density. Our work uncovers a mechano-endocrine axis linking tactile perception to developmental plasticity, bridging ecological cues with molecular pathways. These findings redefine density sensing beyond chemical modalities and offer actionable targets for disrupting pest dispersal strategies, advancing sustainable agriculture.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.