Back

Feasibility of a parent-delivered attention and working memory intervention for early school-aged children born preterm

Bray, S.; Tao, T.; Kaur, S.; Singh, M.; Ip, A.; Yin, S.; Merrikh, D.; Heo, S.; Ryan, E.; Guo, S.; Hendson, L.; Dewey, D.; Macoun, S.

2025-10-13 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.10.680956 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Preterm birth is a common neurodevelopmental condition that can have lasting impacts on cognition, including attention and working memory. Interventions that strengthen these skills in early childhood could support school readiness. Dino Island is a tablet-based intervention that combines process-specific practice of attention and working memory skills with a compensatory component that teaches metacognitive skills to scaffold learning. In this pilot study, we evaluated the feasibility of parent-delivered Dino Island in young children born preterm (N=10), alongside a control group who played educational games (N=12). Both groups were instructed to play 2-3 times per week for approximately 20 minutes over a 12-week period. Attention and working memory on untrained tasks were assessed before and after completing the intervention. Parents provided fidelity data through tracking sheets and participated in exit interviews to offer feedback and identify barriers and facilitators. We found that the Dino Island program was successfully delivered by parents with high fidelity. Attrition was higher in the Dino Island group, likely reflecting the challenges of delivering cognitive remediation in home settings. Comparison of attention and working memory scores on untrained tasks pre- and post-showed practice effects but no specific benefit of Dino Island. However, parent reports suggested behavioral improvements specific to the Dino Island group, noting far-transfer effects where children applied metacognitive strategies in other contexts. Overall, this work shows feasibility and tolerability of Dino Island in young children born preterm. Future research should examine its potential impact on school readiness and longer-term academic outcomes in this population.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
2
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
6
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%