Back

Family Members' Experiences Communicating with Coroners in Suspected Hereditary Sudden Cardiac Death Cases: A Mixed Methods Study

Allan, K. S.; Mason, K. L.; Gershon, A.; Carroll, J.; Dainty, K. N.; Kirsh, J. A.; Cunningham, K. S.; Dorian, P.; Adler, A. S.; Rutberg, J.; Lin, S.; Cheskes, S.; Garner, J.; Siydock, L.; Yee, K.; Lewis, K. B.

2025-10-13 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2025.10.10.25337778 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAs SCD in the young can be caused by heritable cardiac conditions, up to 50% of family members may be at risk. Coroners are often responsible for communicating this risk, in addition to investigating the cause of death. PurposeTo explore how family members of SCD victims experience the type, timing, and suitability of communication with coroners about the cause of death and their own risk for SCD. MethodsWe conducted an explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Eligible family members of SCD victims who died in 2021 from a potentially heritable cardiac condition and were investigated by the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario (Canada) were invited tocomplete a web survey and/or telephone interview. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the survey data and thematic analysis to analyze the interview data. Integration occurred at multiple levels. ResultsWe sent survey invitations to 126 family members of 115 SCD victims; 50 family members completed the web-based survey between September 2022 and February 2024. We interviewed a subset of 17 family members. Most participants received initial communication by phone (n=30, 60%) or in-person (n=13, 26%). While many participants (n=39; 78%) received a timeline of when to expect death investigation results, 16 (32%) did not receive results within the expected timeframe. Family members characterized effective communication as clear, with coroners being perceived as kind, accessible, and approachable. When communication needs went unmet, families relied on external support networks to fill information gaps. Suggestions for improved communication included repeating information and using differing modes of communication to enhance understanding. ConclusionsThese findings emphasize the need for coroners to adopt empathetic approaches and to deliver information in a timely and clear manner. Addressing current gaps in communication may ensure the needs of grieving family members of SCD victims are met. What is Known- The unexpected and sometimes unclear cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD), particularly in young persons, leaves families grieving, often with unanswered questions. - In many jurisdictions, coroners investigate SCDs and have the most information regarding the circumstances and possible causes. - Communication with coroners influences families experiences with respect to learning about the cause of death and their own personal risk for a heritable cardiac condition. What this Study Adds- Family members of SCD victims seek clarity, accessibility, approachability, and kindness in their interactions with coroners. - When family members communication needs went unmet, many independently sought resources and support networks outside the coroner system. - Family members recommend improving coroner communication by providing clear timelines for death investigation results, repeating key information using several different modes of communication, and directing the family to counseling resources.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
17.6%
2
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.8%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
7
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
8
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
10
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
17
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%