Protocol for Radiographer x AI led discharge
Bachmann, R.; Nexmann, A.; Mudannayake, J.; Jensen, J.; Sundland, S. L.; Lundemann, M. J.
Show abstract
IntroductionEmergency Department (ED) overcrowding, often exacerbated by prolonged patient length of stay (LOS), is a global challenge. Patients presenting with suspected fractures--many of whom are triaged as low-acuity, contribute significantly to the ED burden. Radiographer-led discharge (RLD), supported by artificial intelligence (AI), presents a potential strategy to streamline care, reduce LOS, and maintain diagnostic safety. MethodsThis multi-centre, retrospective study evaluates whether diagnostic radiographers, assisted by the radiological AI decision support tool RBfracture 2.6, can safely discharge patients with no acute skeletal or joint injury. Fifteen radiographers from three countries will independently assess 340 retrospective radiographic examinations (300 consecutive and 40 enriched with rare findings). Referral notes and AI predictions are available. Reference standards are established by consensus among three MSK radiologists/reporting radiographers. Primary outcomes include ED workload reduction (true negatives) and false negative rate. Secondary outcomes will assess AI standalone performance and inter-country comparison. ResultsThe primary object is to evaluate whether diagnostic radiographers from three different countries, assisted by the AI tool Rbfracture 2.6, can safely reduce the emergency department (ED) workload by discharging patients without acute skeletal or joint injuries, specifically those referred with suspected bone fracture or joint dislocation. A secondary objective is to validate the performance of RBfracture 2.6 in detecting fractures, joint dislocations, elbow effusions, knee effusions, and knee lipohemarthrosis.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validity of intraoperative imageless navigation (Naviswiss™) for component positioning accuracy in primary total hip arthroplasty: Protocol for a prospective observational cohort study in a single-surgeon practice 92%
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 92%
- Comparative Computed Tomography with Stress Manoeuvres for Diagnosing Distal Isolated Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injury in Acute Ankle Sprain: a Protocol for an Accuracy-Test Prospective Study. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the relationship between internal spinal alignment and back shape in patients with scoliosis using PCdare: a comparative, reliability and validation study 94%
- A method for rapid machine learning development for data mining with Doctor-In-The-Loop 93%
- Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 94%
- Observer agreement and clinical significance of chest CT reporting in patients suspected of COVID-19 91%
- Fully automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial CT scans for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning using the nnU-Net framework 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 90%
- X-ray Dark-Field Chest Imaging can Detect and Quantify Emphy-sema in COPD Patients 88%
- Automated and partially-automated contact tracing: a rapid systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 93%
- MyoVision-US: an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software for Automated Analysis of Skeletal Muscle Ultrasonography 92%
- Modified FRAX Score for Prediction of Fall-induced Hip Fractures; The Added Value of Fall Energy, Number, and Social Vulnerability Index 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.