Genetic predisposition for developmental dyslexia in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia
de Boer, S. C. M.; Najar, J.; van 't Hooft, J. J.; Jiang, C.; van Rooijen, K. M. A.; Ostberg, P.; van der Lee, S. J.; Tijms, B.; Groot, C.; Lemstra, A. W.; Pijnenburg, Y. A. L.; Reus, L. M.; Santillo, A. F.
Show abstract
ImportanceMechanisms behind the asymmetric left-hemispheric atrophy observed in primary progressive aphasia (PPA), a neurodegenerative disorder related to either frontotemporal lobar degeneration or Alzheimers disease, remains a mystery. There is an increased prevalence of dyslexia in PPA patients and their relatives, especially in the logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA). This co-occurrence questions whether genetic variants associated with dyslexia are linked to selective neurodegeneration in language-associated brain regions. ObjectiveTo understand if genetic risk for dyslexia contributes to selective vulnerability in PPA, we determined whether polygenic risk scores (PRS) for dyslexia are elevated in PPA in comparison to other dementias and healthy controls. Given previous literature, we hypothesized that PRS for dyslexia is highest in individuals with lvPPA. ParticipantsGenotyped participants from Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (ADC) diagnosed with semantic variant PPA (svPPA), non-fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA), lvPPA, right-temporal variant FTD (rtvFTD), PPA not otherwise specified (PPA NOS), behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), Alzheimers dementia (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), in addition to controls, were included. Sex, age at blood sampling and education was collected. For each participant, PRS for dyslexia were created using genome-wide association study summary statistics on dyslexia (n = 51,800 cases and 1,087,070 controls, a study from 23andMe, Research Institute.). PRS were computed with LDpred2 and standardized. Main outcome(s) and Measure(s)Differences in PRS across diagnostic groups were assessed using linear regression models, with age, sex, education, diagnosis, and the diagnosis x sex interaction term as predictors. Since interaction term diagnosis*sex was significant, analysis was stratified for sex. ResultsA total of 3,407 ADC participants were included, of which n=969 controls, n=66 svPPA, n=30 nfvPPA, n=38 lvPPA, n=51 rtvFTD, n=17 PPA NOS, n=230 bvFTD, n=1750 AD and n=256 DLB cases. Within males, PRS for dyslexia were significantly higher in svPPA compared to all other diagnoses and controls (all p-values <0.05), except compared to nfvPPA. Within females, no significant differences emerged. Conclusion and RelevanceOur findings reveal a shared genetic basis between neurodevelopmental dyslexia and svPPA, indicating a link between developmental and neurodegenerative language disorders.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical features of patients with behavioral variant Alzheimer’s disease (AD): a comparison to behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and amnestic AD groups 95%
- Alzheimer Disease Neuropathological Comorbidities Are Common in the Younger-Old 93%
- Functional connectivity alterations of the temporal lobe and hippocampus in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Verbal fluency tests assess global cognitive status but have limited diagnostic differentiation: Evidence from a large-scale examination of six neurodegenerative diseases 94%
- Establishing two principal dimensions of cognitive variation in Logopenic Progressive Aphasia 94%
- Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The behavioral variant of Alzheimer’s disease does not show a selective loss of Von Economo and phylogenetically related neurons in the anterior cingulate cortex 95%
- White matter integrity is associated with cognition and amyloid burden in older adult Koreans along the Alzheimer’s disease continuum 93%
- Medial temporal lobe atrophy patterns in early- versus late-onset amnestic Alzheimer's disease 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.