Back

Clustering of SARS-CoV-2 membrane proteins in lipid bilayer membranes

McTiernan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Kuhlman, T. E.; Mohideen, U.; Colvin, M. E.; Zandi, R.; Gopinathan, A.

2025-10-10 biophysics
10.1101/2025.10.09.681538 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The accumulation of viral structural proteins along the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) membrane leads to SARS-CoV-2 self-assembly and budding, driven by the interactions between these proteins, RNA and the ERGIC membrane. The membrane protein (M) is believed to interact with other structural proteins and form clusters needed for the induction of membrane curvature that facilitates virion formation. However, the role played by direct and membrane-mediated interactions between M proteins and their interactions with other proteins in the clustering process remains unclear. Here, we utilize a combination of all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, continuum modeling and experiments to show that M-M interactions are sufficient to drive clustering in ERGIC-like lipid bilayers in the absence of other proteins or RNA. Using all-atom MD simulations we were able to estimate the membrane thinning induced by M proteins and the resulting membrane-mediated M-M interaction. Combining this with a continuum model that describes the evolution of M protein density in a planar lipid membrane, we identified the existence of a critical, direct M-M interaction energy needed for cluster assembly at a given density. By comparing the model predictions with analysis of atomic force microscopy images of M protein clusters in supported lipid bilayers, we were able to estimate the direct M-M interaction energy and found it to be significantly larger than the membrane mediated interaction energy. Our work therefore establishes that M protein interactions are sufficient to drive clustering and provides a quantitative understanding of the role played by direct and membrane-mediated interactions of M proteins in viral assembly and budding.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.2%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 13%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.6%
5
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
6
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
8
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
12
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
13
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
23
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
25
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.5%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.5%