DeepCEF: A Deep Causal Estimation Framework for Complex Biological Systems Integrating Local Scores, Independence Tests, and Relation Attributes
Fan, Z.; Zhang, M.; Han, S.
Show abstract
Causal relationship identification is a fundamental and complex research challenge that spans multiple disciplines, including biology, epidemiology, economics, and philosophy. Various scoring techniques and independence tests, such as local scores (e.g., Degenerate Gaussian (DG) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)) and independence tests (e.g., Fishers Z), have been employed in causality estimation. However, these local scores often excel in specific data types or application areas but falter in others, limiting their ability to capture the complexity and heterogeneity of underlying causal mechanisms. For instance, a method may perform well on linear relationships or continuous variables but struggle with discrete variables or non-linear relationships. Real-world observational datasets, particularly those generated in complex biological systems, often contain diverse data types and relationships, making it essential to develop a more comprehensive approach. To address this challenge, we propose a novel causal estimation framework that leverages the powerful classification capabilities of deep neural networks (DNNs) to identify causal patterns in pairwise relationships. Our framework integrates multiple local causality estimation scores, independence tests, and variable attributes, allowing it to capture a wide range of causal mechanisms. To ensure the frameworks robustness and generalizability, we incorporate a diverse range of simulation data and 10 curated real-world datasets into the training procedure. Furthermore, our framework is designed to be extensible, enabling users to easily integrate their own data and additional scores and tests. Our validation results demonstrate that our framework outperforms existing methods in terms of estimation accuracy and precision on both simulation data and real-world biological datasets. By providing a more comprehensive and adaptable approach to causal relationship identification, our framework has the potential to advance research in various fields and improve our understanding of complex biological systems.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- DAGBagM: Learning directed acyclic graphs of mixed variables with an application to identify prognostic protein biomarkers in ovarian cancer 96%
- HARVESTMAN: A framework for hierarchical featurelearning and selection from whole genome sequencingdata 95%
- Towards the Genome-scale Discovery of Bivariate Monotonic Classifiers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-Cell Multi-Modal GAN (scMMGAN) reveals spatial patterns in single-cell data from triple negative breast cancer 93%
- Accurate Prediction of Virus-Host Protein-Protein Interactions via a Siamese Neural Network Using Deep Protein Sequence Embeddings 93%
- RiskPath : Explainable deep learning for multistep biomedical prediction in longitudinal data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Voting-based integration algorithm improves causal network learning from interventional and observational data: an application to cell signaling network inference 96%
- Hi-LASSO: High-performance Python and Apache spark packages for feature selection with high-dimensional data 95%
- DeepGANnel: Synthesis of fully annotated single molecule patch-clamp data using generative adversarial networks 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.