Back

Quality-control Normalization of Fluorescence Microscopy Morphometry and Colocalization Measurements for Improved Accuracy and Cross-instrument Reproducibility

Oreopoulos, J.; Nelson, G.; Gastinger, M.; Morrison, C. L.; Thomas, S.; Kiebler, M.; Boyce, A.; Goetze, B.

2025-10-11 cell biology
10.1101/2025.10.09.681494 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantitative fluorescence microscopy is more reproducible when instrument performance is measured and incorporated into the analysis. We show that routinely monitored quality-control (QC) metrics like the system resolution and inter-channel co-registration are determinant variables that can be used to normalize common image readouts and thereby separate instrument-induced variation from genuine biological changes. For intra-channel morphometry, a Gaussian approximation of the fluorescence imaging process yields analytical factors that predict how geometric measurements (length, separation distance, area, volume, etc.) inflate and scale with resolution blur due to optical misalignments or natural optical quality variations. We validate this behavior by deliberately perturbing the system resolution and by exploiting the natural resolution differences in three nominally equivalent objective lenses configured to image the exact same synapses in cultured hippocampal neurons, where structural differences subtle by eye nonetheless produced statistically significant shifts in measured synaptic puncta volumes. For dual-channel colocalization (overlap) measurements, we normalize the inter-channel co-registration QC metric by the measured point-spread function (PSF) resolutions (rather than theoretical limits associated with the objective lens) and demonstrate how fluorescent pre/postsynaptic cleft protein overlap signals decay in a predictable, exponential fashion as the PSF-normalized registration error increases, with the decay rate depending on the imaged object relative to the PSF size ratio. Mapped field-of-view gradients in channel registration also explain feature orientation flips/rotations and overlap loss without any underlying biological change. Finally, we outline a simple QC-aware microscope normalization workflow where each image measurement dataset is paired with its session PSFs and local co-registration error to remove instrument bias and optionally re-project the results to a declared reference PSF without altering the raw images. This approach improves image measurement accuracy and cross-instrument comparability of experiments and reframes light microscope QC from a passive certification of instrument health into a practical normalization that links the acquisition state to quantitative outcomes, thus ensuring the reliability and interpretability of morphometric and colocalization data in fluorescence microscopy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Microscopy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
11.8%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.6%
4
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
Optica
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
9
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.4%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
14
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.4%
16
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Biophysical Reports
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
23
Optics Express
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Journal of Structural Biology: X
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%