Back

Unconventional centromere architectures in Tapirus indicus reveal hotspots for satellite-free centromere formation in Perissodactyla

Biundo, M.; Piras, F. M.; Rapisarda, E.; Ryder, O. A.; Nergadze, S. G.; Giulotto, E.; Cappelletti, E.

2025-10-10 genomics
10.1101/2025.10.09.681474 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Centromeres, the chromosomal loci responsible for proper segregation during cell division, play a key role in genome evolution and speciation. While centromere function is highly conserved and epigenetically defined by CENP-A, the underlying DNA sequences are among the most rapidly evolving. Although mammalian centromeres are typically associated with satellite DNA, we previously showed that equids carry numerous satellite-free centromeres. In this study, we investigated centromere and karyotype evolution in the endangered Tapirus indicus, a non-equid Perissodactyl with exceptional karyotypic plasticity. Through CENP-A ChIP-seq analysis on the same individual for which a near-gapless diploid genome assembly was available, we identified both canonical satellite-based centromeres and three satellite-free centromeres, emerging from centromere repositioning and representing the first such centromeres described in a non-equid Perissodactyl species. Comparative genomic analysis uncovered evolutionary hotspots for satellite-free centromere formation across Perissodactyla. Finally, analysis of CENP-B binding showed that T. indicus displays uncoupling between CENP-A and CENP-B, a feature previously observed only in equids. These findings reveal that high centromere plasticity is not unique to equids and support a broader model in which centromere plasticity and CENP-B uncoupling contribute to karyotype evolution in mammals.

Published in Communications Biology (predicted rank #15) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.