A Unified Framework for TCR-pMHC Structural Model Assessment
Ascunce-Paris, A.; Farriol-Duran, R.; Romero-Durana, M.; Valencia, A.; Guallar, V.
Show abstract
T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of peptide-MHC complexes (pMHCs) is a central determinant of cellular immunity. Structural insights are key to understanding TCR-pMHC interactions, however progress is limited by the scarcity of experimental structures (PDB = 232 TCR-pMHC class I complexes, date 01/2025). Although protein modelling tools have rapidly advanced, their accuracy on TCR-pMHC complexes is hampered by CDR loop hypervariability, conformational flexibility, and the lack of reliable quality assessment without experimental references. To evaluate the performance of recent protein modelling algorithms on TCR-pMHC complexes, we benchmarked three general-purpose (AlphaFold3, Boltz-2, Chai-1) and two TCR-specific (tFold-TCR, TCRmodel2) modelling tools using a benchmark set of 20 experimentally determined PDB structures, demonstrating AlphaFold3 superior performance. To expand structural coverage beyond the existing experimental landscape, we present a framework that enables quality assessment of TCR-pMHC structural models without requiring experimental reference structures. To this end, we integrate multiple modelling and interface confidence metrics (pLDDT, ipTM, iPAE, pDockQ) into explainable random forest classifiers trained on 1160 models of 232 experimentally determined PDB TCR-pMHC class I complexes. This approach reliably distinguishes low-, acceptable-, medium-, and high-quality models, outperforming the combination of these metrics using literature-established thresholds. Leveraging our quality tier framework, we used AlphaFold3 to generate and evaluate the largest synthetic dataset of TCR-pMHC class I structural models to date from VDJdb-annotated sequences, comprising 33,820 complexes (169,100 models, 5 models per complex) and representing a >70-fold expansion of available structures. We demonstrate the applicability of our quality tier stratification in three settings: 1) filtering validating vs. non-validating TCR-pMHC interaction in sequence databases (VDJdb), 2) enrichment of biologically validated interactions versus synthetic negatives amongst higher quality complexes, and 3) enhancing the predictive performance of TCR-pMHC pairing models. Altogether our TCR-pMHC structural quality tier framework provides a scalable and interpretable approach for improving modelling and functional analyses of TCR-pMHC class I complexes, with translational applications in T-cell and TCR-based immunotherapies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Gradations in protein dynamics captured by experimental NMR are not well represented by AlphaFold2 models and other computational metrics 95%
- Assembly of Protein Complexes In and On the Membrane with Predicted Spatial Arrangement Constraints 94%
- Intrinsically disordered protein ensembles shape evolutionary rates revealing conformational patterns 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- To pack or not to pack: revisiting protein side-chain packing in the post-AlphaFold era 96%
- Benchmarking TCR-pMHC structure prediction: a unified evaluation and CDR3-based functional insights 95%
- SPRI: Structure-Based Pathogenicity Relationship Identifier for Predicting Effects of Single Missense Variants and Discovery of Higher-Order Cancer Susceptibility Clusters of Mutations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the Potential of Structure-Based Deep Learning Approaches for T cell Receptor Design 97%
- Ig-VAE: Generative Modeling of Immunoglobulin Proteins by Direct 3D Coordinate Generation 95%
- Controllable Protein Design via Autoregressive Direct Coupling Analysis Conditioned on Principal Components 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.