High doses of fine biochar in sandy subsoils increase water retention, but also cause first-year yield depressions for drought-stressed barley
Bruun, E. W.; Petersen, C.; Iturbe-Espinoza, P.; Winding, A.; Muller-Stover, D.
Show abstract
ContextCoarse sandy subsoils often suffer from low water retention and rooting depth, limiting crop yields, especially under drought conditions. AimsTo determine whether high doses of fine-grained biochar (150 or 300 Mg/ha) incorporated into sandy subsoil could improve water retention, nutrient uptake, root development and yield of spring barley under drought conditions. MethodsA two-year mesocosm study (2022-2023) using soil columns containing subsoil layers of ground biochar (<80 {micro}m, at 1%, 2% and 4%) or biochar pellets (2%) compared to unamended controls in two sandy soils. Key resultsGround biochar increased available water capacity while intact pellets showed no measurable effect. First-year (2022) biochar applications negatively affected plant growth and nitrogen (N) uptake, likely due to N immobilization. Second-year (2023) results showed neutral to positive yield effects following winter irrigation. Biochar addition did not improve phosphorus uptake, despite the creation of wetter subsoils enriched with P. Root density decreased with increasing biochar concentration especially in one soil type, possibly due to increased potassium levels. Rooting depth was unaffected and greater than under field conditions. ConclusionsBiochar incorporation into sandy subsoils can improve water retention, but may cause temporary N immobilization, affecting first-year crop performance. Overall benefits may emerge in subsequent growing seasons. ImplicationsLong-term field trials are needed to assess nutrient management strategies, including additional N-application the first year. Incorporating biochar in autumn may help avoid N immobilization before spring sowing. Field-scale methods for applying fine-grained biochar to sandy subsoil must be developed. HighlightsO_LIFine-grained biochar can increase the in-situ water retention in coarse sandy subsoils C_LIO_LIIn the first season (2022), biochar reduced barley growth and yield, likely due to initial soil nitrogen immobilization C_LIO_LIIn the second season (2023), after intensive winter irrigation, biochar effects became neutral or positive C_LIO_LIRoot density decreased with biochar use, possibly due to high potassium levels creating unfavourable subsoil conditions C_LI
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The biological sink of atmospheric H2 is more sensitive to spatial variation of microbial diversity than N2O and CO2 emissions in an agroecosystem 96%
- Residue retention promotes soil carbon accumulation in minimum tillage systems: Implications for conservation tillage 95%
- The distribution of particulate organic matter in the heterogeneous soil matrix - balancing between aerobic respiration and denitrification 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Forest growth responds more to air pollution than soil acidification 95%
- One-time Nitrogen Fertilization Shifts Switchgrass Soil Microbiomes within a Context of Larger Spatial and Temporal Variation 93%
- Multiple stressors in multiple species: effects of different RDX soil concentrations and differential water-resourcing on RDX fate, plant health, and plant survival 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tensions in tillage: Reduction in tillage intensity associates with lower wheat growth and nutritional grain quality despite enhanced soil biological indicators 96%
- Unveiling the dominant role of soil pH in shaping nitrogen cycling microbial gene abundances: Insights from 65-years of chemical fertilizer selection in acidic grassland meadow 95%
- Exploitation of neighbouring subsoil for nutrient acquisition under annual-perennial strip intercropping systems 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.