Back

Castl: Robust Identification of Spatially Variable Genes in Spatial Transcriptomics via an Ensemble-based Framework

Yu, Y.; Yang, J.; He, P.-a.; Zheng, X.

2025-10-10 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.10.09.681323 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatially variable genes (SVGs) are essential for elucidating tissue organization within spatially resolved transcriptomics. While a number of computational methods have been developed for SVG identification, their reliance on algorithm-specific assumptions, such as predefined kernel functions or spatial neighborhood graphs, often results in substantial variability in sensitivity and inflated false discovery rates (FDRs) across heterogeneous datasets. To address this challenge, we here develop Castl, an ensemble-based framework for SVG identification that integrates multiple detection methods through statistically designed aggregation modules. Comprehensive evaluations on both simulated and real-world data demonstrate that Castl consistently identifies biologically meaningful spatial expression patterns, mitigates method-specific biases and effectively controls FDRs across various biological contexts, resolutions, and spatial technologies. This flexible, assumption-free framework offers a robust and standardized foundation for spatially informed feature discovery in complex biological systems.

Published in Briefings in Bioinformatics (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
18.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.6%
Similar papers in this journal
Briefings in Bioinformatics · published here
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.4%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Cell Systems
○ 201 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
7
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
9
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
Cell Genomics
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
13
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Patterns
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Genome Medicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
17
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
19
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.8%
20
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.8%
21
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.