Action prediction relies on high-level holistic and low-level kinematics priors
de Vries, I. E. J.; de Lange, F. P.; Wurm, M. F.
Show abstract
Biological motion perception is an essential skill that allows us to quickly infer how others move. While this is often cast as inherently predictive process, it remains unclear to what extent different priors shape neural processing of biological motion. We investigated this by comparing the dynamic representational geometry of human magnetoencephalography (MEG) activity and observed biological motion stimuli by means of dynamic representational similarity analysis (dRSA). Under normal viewing conditions, neural representations were indeed predictive and followed an inverse hierarchy: high-level viewpoint-invariant body motion representations were visible before representations of viewpoint-dependent body motion and low-level visual features. Disrupting holistic priors by turning videos upside down selectively reduced high-level predictions. Instead, disrupting kinematics priors by temporal piecewise scrambling eliminated all motion prediction, with neural activity merely reacting to, rather than predicting, visual input. These findings reveal how low- and high-level priors jointly shape predictive neural processing of observed biological motion. Impact statementDisrupting holistic priors selectively interferes with neural prediction of observed biological motion
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural and behavioral reinstatement jointly reflect retrieval of narrative events 97%
- Motion direction is represented as a bimodal probability distribution in the human visual cortex 96%
- Numerosity tuning in human association cortices and local image contrast representations in early visual cortex 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.